Austin Ventures was one of the most prominent venture capital firms in Texas, but as Dan Primack reported, Austin Ventures has foregone a new fund and, as a result, it ceases to be a VC any longer.
We’ve talked previously about how you can use data to identify Zombie Venture Capital firms and given how things have unfolded with Austin Ventures, it presents a unique case study on how to use data to do this. We used CB Insights Investor Analytics tool to take a look at how Austin Ventures’ investment and exit activity has trended over time to see if there were early signs of zombification. Here are some of the signs that the data turns up:
- Major increases in fund sizes over time
- Significant time lag after last fund raise
- Investment focus shifted to follow-on deals
- Exit activity was depressed
For VC funds or bankers looking to syndicate deals or who are seeking follow-on financing for a company, the identification of zombie VCs is an important way to ensure you’re focused on the right prospective investors.
Note: 100% of the visualizations and data you see in this analysis are directly from the CB Insights platform’s Investor Analytics tool. No Excel was used or harmed.
The drastic increase in Austin Ventures’ fund sizes
The table below highlights Austin Ventures’ fundraising history, the most recent of which was Austin Ventures X for $900M, which came in September 2008.
Fund size consistency has been shown to be a determinant of VC performance. And unlike some other brand-name venture firms such as Union Square Ventures and Benchmark, Austin Ventures had steadily increased its fund sizes over time. Since its inception, Austin Ventures consistently raised new funds every ~3 years (like many funds) and so the fund’s last raise being in 2008 was a clear indication that the firm might be having a tough time getting LP interest.
Deal activity turns primarily to follow-ons
Despite it’s inability to raise a new fund, the data shows that Austin Ventures has not seen any dramatic slowdown in deal activity over the past five years, averaging around six deals per quarter.
But deal activity doesn’t tell you everything. When we break down Austin Ventures’ investments across new deals vs. follow-on deals into existing portfolio companies, a much different picture emerges.
Of note, we see that firm’s percentage of follow-on deals has increased drastically over the past two years as indicated by the vast swaths of orange on the chart below. If you’re evaluating a fund, the lack of a recent fund coupled with high follow-on funding rate is often a high fidelity signal that the firm may be having difficulty fundraising.
Excluded from the unicorn exit trend
On the exit front, Austin Ventures had a solid historical record of notable exits including the IPOs of Series A investments into HomeAway, RetailMeNot and Bazaarvoice. But more recently, Austin Ventures has not notched a huge exit of the magnitude near those above and this is an environment when tech M&A and IPOs and billion dollar exits have been mushrooming. The firm’s lone IPO exit since the start of 2014 was Upland Software‘s $192M IPO and does not count any $100M+ disclosed acquisitions since UnderArmour’s purchase of MapMyFitness for $150M in late 2013. With a $900 million fund, unicorn exits become important to move the needle, and Austin Ventures did not have those.
More notably, Austin Ventures unexited portfolio counts very few Tech IPO Pipeline companies especially versus comparable venture firms by size including Norwest Venture Partners and Bessemer Venture Partners.
The chart below highlights Austin Ventures’ exits with disclosed valuations going back to 1999, taken from their profile on CB Insights. Exit activity had diminished as of late and given their fund size, they didn’t have the size of outcomes that LPs would expect.
- 100% of the visualizations in this Teardown are from Investor Analytics. No MS Excel necessary.
- Visualizations on CB Insights are all interactive so you can click and see underlying transaction details.
- Visit Austin Ventures‘ profile to check out these visualizations on your own.
- Need an account? Sign up here.
This report was created with data from CB Insights’ emerging technology insights platform, which offers clarity into emerging tech and new business strategies through tools like:
- Earnings Transcripts Search Engine & Analytics to get an information edge on competitors’ and incumbents’ strategies
- Patent Analytics to see where innovation is happening next
- Company Mosaic Scores to evaluate startup health, based on our National Science Foundation-backed algorithm
- Business Relationships to quickly see a company’s competitors, partners, and more
- Market Sizing Tools to visualize market growth and spot the next big opportunity