Predict your next investment

Investment Bank
odeoncapital.com

See what CB Insights has to offer

Investments

21

Portfolio Exits

5

Funds

2

About Odeon Capital Group

Odeon Capital Group is an independent full-service firm dedicated to providing advice and execution on all fundamental value and catalyst-driven situations through sales & trading, research, investment banking, and asset management.

Odeon Capital Group Headquarter Location

750 Lexington Avenue 27th Floor

New York, New York, 10022,

United States

Predict your next investment

The CB Insights tech market intelligence platform analyzes millions of data points on venture capital, startups, patents , partnerships and news mentions to help you see tomorrow's opportunities, today.

Latest Odeon Capital Group News

Wall Street is finally getting access to China. How long will it last?

Nov 15, 2021

We’re sorry, this service is currently unavailable. Please try again later. Dismiss By Lananh Nguyen Normal text size Advertisement For decades, US banks have been eager to expand their business in China, the world’s second-largest economy. They’re finally getting their way — just as a spiralling corporate debt crisis threatens to rock the country’s financial system and China’s central government takes a stronger hand with big businesses. In July, Citigroup became the first foreign bank to win approval to open a custody business in China, essentially acting as a bank for Chinese investment funds. In August, JPMorgan Chase got permission from the Chinese authorities to take full ownership of its investment banking and trading business in the country — a century after it first opened shop there. Goldman Sachs received the green light for a similar venture in October. JPMorgan Chase chief Jamie Dimon. The financial giant got permission from Chinese authorities to take full ownership of its investment banking and trading business in the country — a century after it first opened shop there. Credit:Bloomberg As the approvals came in, the message from Beijing was clear: It wanted US lenders to bring more foreign investors into China and help Chinese people buy assets overseas. Thrilled that they no longer have to split profits with local partners for services like underwriting equity deals or providing advice to companies, Wall Street banks are rushing to oblige. They want to broker more transactions, help Chinese companies raise funds and manage money for the country’s rapidly growing moneyed class. The total wealth of China’s 100 richest people increased to $US1.48 trillion ($2 trillion) in 2021 from $US1.33 trillion a year earlier, according to Forbes. “Obviously, what we can do in China is largely dictated by how the Chinese government allows us to operate,” David M. Solomon, CEO of Goldman Sachs, said last month. “We’re encouraged by the fact that after a long period of time they’re allowing us to control our joint venture.” Loading Still, he added, “the US-China bilateral relationship, the politics around China are going to be complicated.” Wall Street banks are gaining ground in China just as a property crisis is brewing, and as its financial system is beginning to reel under the weight of a years-long debt-fuelled corporate boom. Property developer China Evergrande, with some $US300 billion of unpaid debts, has became the poster child for those troubles . Although it narrowly averted default on its bonds last month, Evergrande’s perilous situation is causing panic among other developers that could unsettle the wider Chinese economy. And while the debt woes could create new banking opportunities, they also create unpredictability. Advertisement China is easing restrictions on foreign ownership of financial services firms because it agreed to do so as part of a trade agreement with the Trump administration. But the country could just as easily bar those firms, said Dick Bove, a veteran banking analyst at Odeon Capital Group. “Give it a year and a settling of their financial problems,” Bove said. After that, “they won’t need the American banks, and they can kick them out.” Banks also have to consider the fraught relationship between the United States and China, even though their economies are deeply interlinked. China was America’s largest trading partner for goods last year, with $US559.2 billion in goods changing hands between the two nations, according to the Office of the United States Trade Representative. It was the third-largest market for exported US goods. There are doubts over what will happen to Wall Street’s access to China once its financial system has stabilised. Credit:AP The flow of goods and services has continued despite a continuing trade war that intensified in 2018 after President Donald Trump imposed tariffs on a broad swath of Chinese products. President John Biden is scheduled to hold a virtual summit with President Xi Jinping of China on Tuesday AEDT amid friction over trade, cyber threats and Taiwan, among other issues. Geopolitical tensions involving Taiwan and worries that military manoeuvres could spiral into hostilities that would jolt financial markets have also weighed on the minds of financiers. Six senior Wall Street banking executives, who declined to speak publicly about some aspects of their business because of the political sensitivities, said that although they welcomed China’s latest steps toward financial opening, they were keenly aware that the Chinese government could at any moment revoke their right to do business. They noted that their firms had other bases in Asia, like Singapore or Tokyo, in case they needed to pivot away from the mainland. Bankers cited Beijing’s crackdown on tech companies, including the ride-hailing giant Didi, the internet powerhouse Tencent and the e-commerce giant Alibaba, as examples of other policy changes that could unnerve foreign businesses and investors. Xi’s “common prosperity” initiative to address the country’s wealth gap, which has put many homegrown tycoons on notice, is also worrisome to foreign companies. “Give it a year and a settling of their financial problems. [After that] they won’t need the American banks, and they can kick them out.” Dick Bove, a veteran banking analyst at Odeon Capital Group. Last year, Chinese regulators scrapped the initial public offering of Ant Group , an internet finance company controlled by Jack Ma, the co-founder of Alibaba. The celebrity billionaire has kept a low profile and pledged along with other business moguls billions of dollars to charity. Still, the banks are charging ahead. They are taking full ownership of joint ventures or finding new business partners. JPMorgan and Goldman are aiming to expand their operations across the board in China, from underwriting equity and debt offerings to advising on cross-border deals and building out trading activities. Goldman also has a tie-up with ICBC Wealth Management, a local player that gives it a shot at managing money for some of ICBC’s 26 million personal customers and 730,000 corporate clients. Bank of America, which has been slower than rivals to build a footprint in China, plans to apply for permission to set up a brokerage. Morgan Stanley is waiting for Chinese regulators to approve an increase in ownership of its Chinese securities firm to 90 per cent. The bank is also seeking to raise its stake in a fund-management joint venture to 85 per cent. And BlackRock, the asset management behemoth, raised $US1 billion in September from Chinese investors for the country’s first foreign-run mutual fund three months after authorities gave the go-ahead. Bridgewater chief Ray Dalio has urged investors not to read the Chinese government’s actions as necessarily “anti-capitalist.” Credit:Bloomberg Citigroup is focusing on building its wealth management business. Even as it sheds some consumer-banking operations on the continent, the bank aims to double staffing in its private bank in Asia and concentrate on serving wealthy clients, including in China, said Ida Liu, Citi’s global head of private banking. But the lender also monitors Chinese policies “super closely” and has explained to clients that strained US-Chinese relations may introduce more volatility into their portfolios, Liu said in October. US banks are also bullish about the potential to sell financial products to China’s rising middle class as it seeks out investments beyond real estate. Nearly three-quarters of household wealth in China is tied to property, and the debt-ridden housing market is increasingly seen as a threat to the economy. Loading Wall Street’s enthusiasm for China is echoed by some of its biggest clients, including hedge funds, money managers and other major American investors who have been so far undeterred by the common-prosperity agenda and the Evergrande saga. Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater, the world’s largest hedge fund, has urged investors not to read the Chinese government’s actions as necessarily “anti-capitalist.” In media interviews and in a LinkedIn post in July, he said diversified portfolios should include investments in both the United States and China. Investors appear to be taking heed, said Kimberley Stafford, global head of product strategy at PIMCO, the giant asset manager. “We’re seeing a lot of institutional investors stay the course in China,” Stafford said last month. “This is perhaps an indication that allocations to China are sticky, and have staying power, and people are in it for more of the long term.” This article originally appeared in The New York Times

Odeon Capital Group Investments

21 Investments

Odeon Capital Group has made 21 investments. Their latest investment was in ServiceChannel as part of their Series C on February 2, 2013.

CBI Logo

Odeon Capital Group Investments Activity

investments chart

Date

Round

Company

Amount

New?

Co-Investors

Sources

2/7/2013

Series C

ServiceChannel

$2M

No

1

1/28/2009

Series B

ServiceChannel

$0.75M

No

1

6/1/2007

Series A

ServiceChannel

$10.8M

Yes

1

10/13/2003

Unattributed VC

Subscribe to see more

$99M

Subscribe to see more

0

5/11/2001

Unattributed VC

Subscribe to see more

$99M

Subscribe to see more

0

Date

2/7/2013

1/28/2009

6/1/2007

10/13/2003

5/11/2001

Round

Series C

Series B

Series A

Unattributed VC

Unattributed VC

Company

ServiceChannel

ServiceChannel

ServiceChannel

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Amount

$2M

$0.75M

$10.8M

$99M

$99M

New?

No

No

Yes

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Co-Investors

Sources

1

1

1

0

0

Odeon Capital Group Portfolio Exits

5 Portfolio Exits

Odeon Capital Group has 5 portfolio exits. Their latest portfolio exit was iProperty Group on November 03, 2015.

Date

Exit

Companies

Valuation
Valuations are submitted by companies, mined from state filings or news, provided by VentureSource, or based on a comparables valuation model.

Acquirer

Sources

11/3/2015

Acquired

$99M

2

1/21/2015

Acq - Fin

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

10

12/20/2002

Acquired

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

0

9/5/2001

Acquired

Subscribe to see more

$99M

Subscribe to see more

0

8/24/2001

Reverse Merger

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

10

Date

11/3/2015

1/21/2015

12/20/2002

9/5/2001

8/24/2001

Exit

Acquired

Acq - Fin

Acquired

Acquired

Reverse Merger

Companies

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Valuation

$99M

$99M

Acquirer

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Sources

2

10

0

0

10

Odeon Capital Group Fund History

2 Fund Histories

Odeon Capital Group has 2 funds, including Odeon Capital Partners II LP.

Closing Date

Fund

Fund Type

Status

Amount

Sources

12/31/2000

Odeon Capital Partners II LP

Early-Stage Venture Capital

Withdrawn

$230M

1

12/31/1999

Odeon Capital Partners LP

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

$99M

10

Closing Date

12/31/2000

12/31/1999

Fund

Odeon Capital Partners II LP

Odeon Capital Partners LP

Fund Type

Early-Stage Venture Capital

Subscribe to see more

Status

Withdrawn

Subscribe to see more

Amount

$230M

$99M

Sources

1

10

Odeon Capital Group Team

2 Team Members

Odeon Capital Group has 2 team members, including current Managing Partner, Matthew A Smith.

Name

Work History

Title

Status

Matthew A Smith

Wheatley Partners

Managing Partner

Current

Jeffrey Finkle

Managing Partner

Former

Name

Matthew A Smith

Jeffrey Finkle

Work History

Wheatley Partners

Title

Managing Partner

Managing Partner

Status

Current

Former

CB Insights uses Cookies

CBI websites generally use certain cookies to enable better interactions with our sites and services. Use of these cookies, which may be stored on your device, permits us to improve and customize your experience. You can read more about your cookie choices at our privacy policy here. By continuing to use this site you are consenting to these choices.