Investments
3Portfolio Exits
2Service Providers
3
Want to inform investors similar to Mercury Interactive about your company?
Submit your Analyst Briefing to get in front of investors, customers, and partners on CB Insights’ platform.
Latest Mercury Interactive News
May 11, 2022
Posted On: During the last 40 years in technology, there has never been a more vibrant and inventive period of time. Access to technology and cash have fueled a startup culture that is more dynamic than ever before. As many as tens of thousands of startups are competing for the next big thing, how can you tell which ones will succeed? After beginning out in sales, I went on to become a senior executive, an investor, and a board member at a variety of technology businesses throughout the course of the last four decades. I can tell you from personal experience that identifying the rising star who will have the most influence is a difficult task. However, one thing is certain: Every successful firm I’ve ever seen gives actual value because people purchase value.. Value. Even if technology is critical, if a firm is really successful, it must have a compelling economic case to back it up. An organization’s potential for greatness may be gauged by looking at a few key indications. You may use the following pointers to find firms that deliver value whether you want to keep an eye on the competition, join one, develop a partnership, or look for a model to follow. The TAM is a good place to start A company’s growth potential may be objectively measured by looking at the Total Addressable Market (TAM). A new entrant has an uphill battle if the market is already crowded with several rivals. An alternative path to market dominance is via the introduction of an innovative product that solves a problem that no one else has tackled — or at least, there are very few people who have attempted to do so. Early market leaders have a significant advantage, as is well-known in economics. It is important to evaluate both the present size and the projected growth of the TAM when making a decision. AppDynamics’ TAM for application performance management (APM) was first expected to be $2 billion. CA, IBM, BMC, and HP’s APM sales were combined to arrive at this total. Some, on the other hand, failed to see the change from traditional Java and.NET software to more contemporary ones that was propelling digital transformation. We were able to discuss an APM TAM of $16 billion as we were getting ready to go public. Rather of focusing on the past, focus on the future. TAM, a cloud-native app, seems to be going through the same scenario. According to Gartner, 95% of all digital projects will be based on cloud-native technology by 2025. Rather of focusing on the past, focus on where the puck is going. Evaluate the needs of the market and come up with solutions that are beneficial to the customer. If a product does not address a pressing need for the client, it is only a “nice-to-have” and unlikely to be included in an organization’s budget. A product’s distinctive commercial value is shown and it obtains a competitive position when it fulfils both desires and requirements. To be sure, there are wide variations in demand among markets. As an example, think about risk management. There are several elements that determine whether or not a product that reduces the danger of injury or death is really necessary. Risk mitigation demand rises when the market is turbulent, and the necessity for it soars. In a turbulent market, security, safety, and savings are more essential than they are in a more stable market since certain dangers increase. For both hard money savings (which CFOs adore) and soft dollar savings, the business effect should be obvious regardless of the market (for example, protecting your company brand). You should be able to clearly describe which advantage belongs in either category so that prospects may make an informed purchasing choice based on both. For long-term success, a product or service must be able to stand on its own, based on both hard dollar and soft dollar advantages, rather than relying just on better features. At CrowdStrike, I was able to see the company’s unprecedented development and success. In order to achieve this level of success, the firm must first design the finest security solution in its market—a solution better to any given by the company’s traditional competitors—and then make that solution simple to use. Everything the firm produces, sells, and supports is scrutinised by George Kurtz, the company’s CEO. Before entering into any agreement, he asks, “What does the prospect’s Business Value Assessment look like?” “Walking the talk” is an uncommon quality in a high-tech CEO. I believe this is a vital factor in the company’s success, and one that will also secure its long-term viability. Don’t be a trend follower, be a success follower It’s critical for businesses to see above the hype around their products and the industry as a whole. In hot fields like crypto or AI, additional partners and investors are likely, but goods in such marketplaces must rise above the noise and trend to demonstrate distinct commercial value and long-term viability. Consider the timing versus the trajectory to see whether firms are on schedule to meet or exceed their business objectives when evaluating success (i.e. customers, growth statistics, renewal rates, time to business value, investments). If a company is legitimate, it will be able to provide proof of its success. In the AppDynamics organisation, we never claimed that we were responsible for client happiness. Insufficiently ferocious: Instead, the Chief Customer Success Officer, Hatim Shafique, was tasked with leading the firm toward achieving customer success. “How likely is the consumer to promote our product to someone else?” was the question we asked while calculating Net Promoter Scores (NPS). It also pushed for Business Value Realization (BVR), or “Was the client able to get what they paid for?” Renewal rates, upsells, cross-sells, and customer recommendations all rose as a result of a laser-like focus on NPS and BVR. Users and evangelists should be separated. Using one’s own product shows a company’s faith in the product’s capabilities. Fixing, changing, or upgrading a product fast for the company’s own use creates value that eventually trickles down to customers. The intrinsic commercial value of a product can only be shown by its actual use, not only through its promotion. There are a surprising amount of potential customers who never inquire about a vendor or Alliance Partner’s usage of the product in their own firm. Problems are more rapidly recognised and hardened for corporate usage when a firm employs its own solution internally. In addition, putting real developers in direct contact with real customers is a good idea. Developers may learn a lot by seeing how their product is used in the real world. Researchers at Mercury Interactive and AppDynamics found that developers were consistently taken aback and inspired by how users were really using the solution, sometimes in ways that they had never anticipated. AppDynamics also provided developers to staff the demo stations during the Customer Conference. Interaction between the solution’s users and its creators was a win-win situation for everyone involved. AppDynamics CEO Jyoti Bansal spearheaded this programme, which is still considered a best practise today. The art and science of predicting the next tech giant is a delicate balancing act. It requires both large-scale and fine-grained observation. It involves knowing more about the future of a certain market than you do about the past. It is critical to know whether companies have a true, distinctive commercial value in order to anticipate their future success. When it comes to the IT industry as a whole, there is no question that the next five years are going to be the most competitive we’ve ever seen. Long-term financial and professional success may be achieved by correctly predicting winners. Congratulations for predicting the winners of the next competitions!
Mercury Interactive Investments
3 Investments
Mercury Interactive has made 3 investments. Their latest investment was in InteQ Corporation as part of their Series B on October 10, 2002.

Mercury Interactive Investments Activity

Date | Round | Company | Amount | New? | Co-Investors | Sources |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10/9/2002 | Series B | InteQ Corporation | $65M | Yes | ||
8/6/2001 | Series C | |||||
5/21/2001 | Series B |
Date | 10/9/2002 | 8/6/2001 | 5/21/2001 |
---|---|---|---|
Round | Series B | Series C | Series B |
Company | InteQ Corporation | ||
Amount | $65M | ||
New? | Yes | ||
Co-Investors | |||
Sources |
Mercury Interactive Portfolio Exits
2 Portfolio Exits
Mercury Interactive has 2 portfolio exits. Their latest portfolio exit was Guardent on February 23, 2004.
Mercury Interactive Acquisitions
8 Acquisitions
Mercury Interactive acquired 8 companies. Their latest acquisition was Systinet on January 31, 2006.
Date | Investment Stage | Companies | Valuation Valuations are submitted by companies, mined from state filings or news, provided by VentureSource, or based on a comparables valuation model. | Total Funding | Note | Sources |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1/31/2006 | Series C | $27.3M | Acquired | 1 | ||
1/24/2006 | Other Venture Capital | |||||
7/16/2004 | Series B | |||||
8/18/2003 | Series B | |||||
8/5/2003 |
Date | 1/31/2006 | 1/24/2006 | 7/16/2004 | 8/18/2003 | 8/5/2003 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investment Stage | Series C | Other Venture Capital | Series B | Series B | |
Companies | |||||
Valuation | |||||
Total Funding | $27.3M | ||||
Note | Acquired | ||||
Sources | 1 |
Mercury Interactive Service Providers
4 Service Providers
Mercury Interactive has 4 service provider relationships
Service Provider | Associated Rounds | Provider Type | Service Type |
---|---|---|---|
Investment Bank | Bookrunner | ||
Service Provider | |||
---|---|---|---|
Associated Rounds | |||
Provider Type | Investment Bank | ||
Service Type | Bookrunner |
Partnership data by VentureSource
Mercury Interactive Team
30 Team Members
Mercury Interactive has 30 team members, including current Chief Executive Officer, Aryeh Finegold.
Name | Work History | Title | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Aryeh Finegold | Chief Executive Officer | Current | |
Name | Aryeh Finegold | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Work History | |||||
Title | Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Status | Current |
Discover the right solution for your team
The CB Insights tech market intelligence platform analyzes millions of data points on vendors, products, partnerships, and patents to help your team find their next technology solution.