Search company, investor...

Predict your next investment

Corporation
COMPUTER HARDWARE & SERVICES | IT Services / IT Solutions & Software Development

Investments

3

Portfolio Exits

2

Service Providers

3

About Mercury Interactive

Mercury Interactive is an application management and delivery and IT governance service providing company. On July 25, 2006, Mercury Interactive was acquired by Hewlett-Packard at a valution of $4.5B.

Headquarters Location

Mountain View, California,

United States

Want to inform investors similar to Mercury Interactive about your company?

Submit your Analyst Briefing to get in front of investors, customers, and partners on CB Insights’ platform.

Latest Mercury Interactive News

seeing the next major tech business to come around

May 11, 2022

Posted On: During the last 40 years in technology, there has never been a more vibrant and inventive period of time. Access to technology and cash have fueled a startup culture that is more dynamic than ever before. As many as tens of thousands of startups are competing for the next big thing, how can you tell which ones will succeed? After beginning out in sales, I went on to become a senior executive, an investor, and a board member at a variety of technology businesses throughout the course of the last four decades. I can tell you from personal experience that identifying the rising star who will have the most influence is a difficult task. However, one thing is certain: Every successful firm I’ve ever seen gives actual value because people purchase value.. Value. Even if technology is critical, if a firm is really successful, it must have a compelling economic case to back it up. An organization’s potential for greatness may be gauged by looking at a few key indications. You may use the following pointers to find firms that deliver value whether you want to keep an eye on the competition, join one, develop a partnership, or look for a model to follow. The TAM is a good place to start A company’s growth potential may be objectively measured by looking at the Total Addressable Market (TAM). A new entrant has an uphill battle if the market is already crowded with several rivals. An alternative path to market dominance is via the introduction of an innovative product that solves a problem that no one else has tackled — or at least, there are very few people who have attempted to do so. Early market leaders have a significant advantage, as is well-known in economics. It is important to evaluate both the present size and the projected growth of the TAM when making a decision. AppDynamics’ TAM for application performance management (APM) was first expected to be $2 billion. CA, IBM, BMC, and HP’s APM sales were combined to arrive at this total. Some, on the other hand, failed to see the change from traditional Java and.NET software to more contemporary ones that was propelling digital transformation. We were able to discuss an APM TAM of $16 billion as we were getting ready to go public. Rather of focusing on the past, focus on the future. TAM, a cloud-native app, seems to be going through the same scenario. According to Gartner, 95% of all digital projects will be based on cloud-native technology by 2025. Rather of focusing on the past, focus on where the puck is going. Evaluate the needs of the market and come up with solutions that are beneficial to the customer. If a product does not address a pressing need for the client, it is only a “nice-to-have” and unlikely to be included in an organization’s budget. A product’s distinctive commercial value is shown and it obtains a competitive position when it fulfils both desires and requirements. To be sure, there are wide variations in demand among markets. As an example, think about risk management. There are several elements that determine whether or not a product that reduces the danger of injury or death is really necessary. Risk mitigation demand rises when the market is turbulent, and the necessity for it soars. In a turbulent market, security, safety, and savings are more essential than they are in a more stable market since certain dangers increase. For both hard money savings (which CFOs adore) and soft dollar savings, the business effect should be obvious regardless of the market (for example, protecting your company brand). You should be able to clearly describe which advantage belongs in either category so that prospects may make an informed purchasing choice based on both. For long-term success, a product or service must be able to stand on its own, based on both hard dollar and soft dollar advantages, rather than relying just on better features. At CrowdStrike, I was able to see the company’s unprecedented development and success. In order to achieve this level of success, the firm must first design the finest security solution in its market—a solution better to any given by the company’s traditional competitors—and then make that solution simple to use. Everything the firm produces, sells, and supports is scrutinised by George Kurtz, the company’s CEO. Before entering into any agreement, he asks, “What does the prospect’s Business Value Assessment look like?” “Walking the talk” is an uncommon quality in a high-tech CEO. I believe this is a vital factor in the company’s success, and one that will also secure its long-term viability. Don’t be a trend follower, be a success follower It’s critical for businesses to see above the hype around their products and the industry as a whole. In hot fields like crypto or AI, additional partners and investors are likely, but goods in such marketplaces must rise above the noise and trend to demonstrate distinct commercial value and long-term viability. Consider the timing versus the trajectory to see whether firms are on schedule to meet or exceed their business objectives when evaluating success (i.e. customers, growth statistics, renewal rates, time to business value, investments). If a company is legitimate, it will be able to provide proof of its success. In the AppDynamics organisation, we never claimed that we were responsible for client happiness. Insufficiently ferocious: Instead, the Chief Customer Success Officer, Hatim Shafique, was tasked with leading the firm toward achieving customer success. “How likely is the consumer to promote our product to someone else?” was the question we asked while calculating Net Promoter Scores (NPS). It also pushed for Business Value Realization (BVR), or “Was the client able to get what they paid for?” Renewal rates, upsells, cross-sells, and customer recommendations all rose as a result of a laser-like focus on NPS and BVR. Users and evangelists should be separated. Using one’s own product shows a company’s faith in the product’s capabilities. Fixing, changing, or upgrading a product fast for the company’s own use creates value that eventually trickles down to customers. The intrinsic commercial value of a product can only be shown by its actual use, not only through its promotion. There are a surprising amount of potential customers who never inquire about a vendor or Alliance Partner’s usage of the product in their own firm. Problems are more rapidly recognised and hardened for corporate usage when a firm employs its own solution internally. In addition, putting real developers in direct contact with real customers is a good idea. Developers may learn a lot by seeing how their product is used in the real world. Researchers at Mercury Interactive and AppDynamics found that developers were consistently taken aback and inspired by how users were really using the solution, sometimes in ways that they had never anticipated. AppDynamics also provided developers to staff the demo stations during the Customer Conference. Interaction between the solution’s users and its creators was a win-win situation for everyone involved. AppDynamics CEO Jyoti Bansal spearheaded this programme, which is still considered a best practise today. The art and science of predicting the next tech giant is a delicate balancing act. It requires both large-scale and fine-grained observation. It involves knowing more about the future of a certain market than you do about the past. It is critical to know whether companies have a true, distinctive commercial value in order to anticipate their future success. When it comes to the IT industry as a whole, there is no question that the next five years are going to be the most competitive we’ve ever seen. Long-term financial and professional success may be achieved by correctly predicting winners. Congratulations for predicting the winners of the next competitions!

Mercury Interactive Investments

3 Investments

Mercury Interactive has made 3 investments. Their latest investment was in InteQ Corporation as part of their Series B on October 10, 2002.

CBI Logo

Mercury Interactive Investments Activity

investments chart

Date

Round

Company

Amount

New?

Co-Investors

Sources

10/9/2002

Series B

InteQ Corporation

$65M

Yes

8/6/2001

Series C

Subscribe to see more

$99M

Subscribe to see more

0

5/21/2001

Series B

Subscribe to see more

$99M

Subscribe to see more

0

Date

10/9/2002

8/6/2001

5/21/2001

Round

Series B

Series C

Series B

Company

InteQ Corporation

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Amount

$65M

$99M

$99M

New?

Yes

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Co-Investors

Sources

0

0

Mercury Interactive Portfolio Exits

2 Portfolio Exits

Mercury Interactive has 2 portfolio exits. Their latest portfolio exit was Guardent on February 23, 2004.

Date

Exit

Companies

Valuation
Valuations are submitted by companies, mined from state filings or news, provided by VentureSource, or based on a comparables valuation model.

Acquirer

Sources

2/23/2004

Acquired

$99M

6/6/2003

Acquired

Subscribe to see more

$99M

Subscribe to see more

0

Date

2/23/2004

6/6/2003

Exit

Acquired

Acquired

Companies

Subscribe to see more

Valuation

$99M

$99M

Acquirer

Subscribe to see more

Sources

0

Mercury Interactive Acquisitions

8 Acquisitions

Mercury Interactive acquired 8 companies. Their latest acquisition was Systinet on January 31, 2006.

Date

Investment Stage

Companies

Valuation
Valuations are submitted by companies, mined from state filings or news, provided by VentureSource, or based on a comparables valuation model.

Total Funding

Note

Sources

1/31/2006

Series C

$99M

$27.3M

Acquired

1

1/24/2006

Other Venture Capital

Subscribe to see more

$99M

$99M

Subscribe to see more

0

7/16/2004

Series B

Subscribe to see more

$99M

$99M

Subscribe to see more

0

8/18/2003

Series B

Subscribe to see more

$99M

$99M

Subscribe to see more

0

8/5/2003

Subscribe to see more

$99M

Subscribe to see more

10

Date

1/31/2006

1/24/2006

7/16/2004

8/18/2003

8/5/2003

Investment Stage

Series C

Other Venture Capital

Series B

Series B

Companies

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Valuation

$99M

$99M

$99M

$99M

$99M

Total Funding

$27.3M

$99M

$99M

$99M

Note

Acquired

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Sources

1

0

0

0

10

Mercury Interactive Service Providers

4 Service Providers

Mercury Interactive has 4 service provider relationships

Service Provider

Associated Rounds

Provider Type

Service Type

Investment Bank

Bookrunner

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Service Provider

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Associated Rounds

Provider Type

Investment Bank

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Service Type

Bookrunner

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Partnership data by VentureSource

Mercury Interactive Team

30 Team Members

Mercury Interactive has 30 team members, including current Chief Executive Officer, Aryeh Finegold.

Name

Work History

Title

Status

Aryeh Finegold

Chief Executive Officer

Current

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Name

Aryeh Finegold

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Work History

Title

Chief Executive Officer

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Status

Current

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Subscribe to see more

Discover the right solution for your team

The CB Insights tech market intelligence platform analyzes millions of data points on vendors, products, partnerships, and patents to help your team find their next technology solution.

Request a demo

CBI websites generally use certain cookies to enable better interactions with our sites and services. Use of these cookies, which may be stored on your device, permits us to improve and customize your experience. You can read more about your cookie choices at our privacy policy here. By continuing to use this site you are consenting to these choices.