Predict your next investment

Angel Investor (Individual)

See what CB Insights has to offer

Investments

1

About Amy Chua

Amy Chua is a professor at Yale Law School.

Amy Chua Headquarter Location

Connecticut,

United States

Predict your next investment

The CB Insights tech market intelligence platform analyzes millions of data points on venture capital, startups, patents , partnerships and news mentions to help you see tomorrow's opportunities, today.

Latest Amy Chua News

Q&A: Amy Chua on the rise of political tribalism in America

Sep 2, 2020

SupChina Foreign Affairs Amy Chua is a professor at Yale Law School and the author of five books. In 2011, she became a household name after publishing her book Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother, a memoir documenting her strict parenting style. Prior to SupChina’s fourth annual Women’s Conference, we spoke with Chua about political tribalism, her parenting memoir, and her career in law. Close post dialog window Amy Chua is a professor at Yale Law School and the author of five books. In 2011, she became a household name after publishing her book Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother, a memoir documenting her strict parenting style. The book was an instant bestseller, which has been translated into over 30 languages. In 2018, Chua published Political Tribes: Group Instinct and the Fate of Nations, in which she explores the power of tribalism and how it has become a growing threat in America. Ahead of the conference, we spoke with Chua about political tribalism, her parenting memoir, and her career in law. SupChina: In your most recent book, Political Tribes: Group Instinct and the Fate of Nations, you discuss the power of tribalism. Human beings are tribal by nature, and group identities are not inherently harmful; however tribalism has started to take over the political system, and this can have damaging effects. To what do you attribute the rise of political tribes in the U.S.? Chua: Political tribalism has always existed to some extent in this country (many voices were just suppressed), but I think two factors explain what makes this particular moment different — that is, why the U.S. is so bitterly polarized today and why that polarization is generating the specific dynamics we’re seeing. The first is massive demographic transformation. For 200 years, America was dominated economically, politically, and culturally by a white majority. When one group is so overwhelmingly dominant, it can persecute with impunity, but it can also afford to be more generous and inclusive, like the WASP elites of the 1960s who voluntarily opened up Ivy League colleges to more Jews, blacks, and other minorities, in part because it seemed like right thing to do. Today, for the first time in U.S. history, whites are on the verge of losing their majority status. Already, non-Hispanic whites are a minority in Texas and California, America’s two most populous states, as well as in New Mexico, Hawaii, and Washington, D.C. Less than half of American children under the age of fifteen are white. According to projections from the Pew Foundation, whites will cease to be a majority in America by 2055. The result is that in America today, every group feels threatened. Not just minorities, but whites feel threatened. Over half of white Americans believe that “whites have replaced blacks as the ‘primary victims of discrimination.’”  Today, it’s not just religious minorities like Jews and Muslims who feel threatened; Christians feel threatened, outraged by the “war on the Bible.” With President Trump in the White House, women feel threatened. With the #MeToo movement, men do. Straights and gays, Latinos and Asians, liberals and conservatives — all feel they are being attacked, bullied, discriminated against. And when groups feel threatened, they retreat into tribalism. They close ranks and become more insular, more us-versus-them. This — combined with record levels of inequality — is why we’re now seeing such intense identity politics on both sides of the political spectrum. But there’s a second reason we’re seeing new political pathologies in the United States. This has to do with the phenomenon of “market-dominant minorities” — a term I coined in 2003 to refer to a minority group, perceived by the rest of the population as outsiders, who control vastly disproportionate amounts of a nation’s wealth. Such minorities are common in the developing world. They can be ethnic groups, like the tiny Chinese minority in Indonesia who make up just 3% of the population but control roughly 70% of the nation’s private economy, or they can be distinct in other ways, culturally or religiously, like the Sunni minority in Iraq that controlled the nation’s vast oil wealth under Saddam Hussein. In countries with a market-dominant minority, democracy can be extremely destabilizing. Easily manipulated by power-seeking demagogues, resentful majorities who see themselves as the country’s rightful owners demand to have “their” country back. Ethnonationalism rears its head, and democracy becomes a vehicle not for peace and prosperity, but for escalating, often deadly political tribalism. This dynamic unfolded disastrously in Iraq in 2003 and was also at play in the former Yugoslavia, Zimbabwe, Venezuela. For most of U.S. history, it seemed as though Americans were relatively immune to dynamics like these. Part of the reason is that we never had a market-dominant minority. On the contrary, for two hundred years, America was economically and politically dominated by the white majority — a politically stable, if often invidious, state of affairs. But today, something has changed. Race has split America’s poor, and class has split America’s white majority. As a result, we may be seeing the emergence of America’s own version of a market-dominant minority: basically, the country’s cosmopolitan elites, most of whom are urban and live on America’s coasts. America’s cosmopolitan elites bear a striking resemblance to the market-dominant minorities of the developing world. Wealth in the United States is extraordinarily concentrated in the hands of a relatively small number of people, who dominate key sectors of the economy, including Wall Street, the media, Hollywood and Silicon Valley. Although these elites are not an ethnic or religious minority, they are culturally distinct, sharing similar cosmopolitan values. They are extremely insular, interacting and intermarrying primarily among themselves, attending the same elite schools, and are often viewed as arrogant and condescending by the rest of the country. It’s important to note that these cosmopolitan elites are not all white; indeed, from the point of view of working class whites, the Harvard-educated, elegantly dressed, professorial-sounding Barack Obama is the classic cosmopolitan elite. Most important, because these elites are viewed by many in America’s working class as “minority-loving” and pro-immigrant — caring about the poor in Africa more than the poor in the U.S. — they are seen as unconcerned with “real” Americans, indeed as threatening their way of life. What happened in America in 2016 is exactly what I would have predicted for a developing country pursuing elections in the presence of a deeply resented market-dominant minority: the rise of a populist movement in which demagogic voices called on “real” Americans to “take back our country” — or in Donald Trump’s words, “Make America Great Again.” Because of the two factors just discussed — radical demographic transformation and the emergence in the U.S. of our own idiosyncratic version of a market-dominant minority — America is starting to display, for the first time in its history, many destructive political dynamics typically associated with “developing” countries: ethnonationalist movements, an erosion of trust in institutions and in electoral outcomes, lurches toward authoritarianism, elite backlash against the less-educated working class — or “deplorables,” as Hillary Clinton famously called them — and above all, the transformation of democracy into an engine of zero-sum political tribalism. SupChina: We have reached a point where people on opposite sides of the political divide can barely talk to one another. Our allegiance to “political tribes” is leading to the breakdown of a national identity. How do we create spaces for discourse when people are not willing to listen? What needs to happen in order for the United States to rebuild its national identity? Chua: There is no easy solution. One might have hoped that the pandemic would bring people together, but so far there’s little sign of that happening. In terms of specific reforms, one possible proposal to bridge the chasm between America’s cosmopolitan elites and Trump’s blue-collar base would be a national service program where young Americans are encouraged or required to spend a year after high school not abroad, but in an unfamiliar part of America — for example a young New Yorker could do a stint in rural Appalachia. In this way young people of different backgrounds, who usually stay in their own echo chambers, would have an opportunity to interact and work with (not just “help”) people they would normally never cross paths. A silver lining of the pandemic is that it provides many opportunities of this kind; there is a tremendous need for help all over the country with contact tracing, sanitizing public places, delivering food, tutoring children, and so on, and young people are least susceptible to the dangers of COVID-19. SupChina: What are the political implications of tribal identities in China? In what ways do political tribes differ in China compared to the U.S? Chua: I haven’t written about China specifically, but I would say that the dynamic in China is very different from the U.S., because China is dominated economically, politically, and culturally by the ethnic Han Chinese, who make up over 90% of the population. So that is far and away the dominant political tribe. SupChina: Your well-known memoir, Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother, was published nine years ago. This was a more personal piece than your other books, and from what I understand, you were not entirely expecting the controversy that it created. What was your driving motivation to write this book? For people who might be reading this book today, what do you hope they take away from it? What advice might you offer to younger women pursuing a career in law? Chua: People don’t realize it, but I really wrote the book in a moment of total crisis, when my (very stubborn!) younger daughter Lulu rebelled at the age of thirteen. She was so angry I thought I might really lose her, so I completely changed my approach; I got less strict with her, gave her more choices, and did much more compromising. And I’m so glad I did! It’s hard to come up with one takeaway, but I would say: make sure you pay attention to your child’s personality, try to combine the best of East and West, and try to make sure there is fun and humor in the household! Laughter is the best release valve! SupChina: What initially sparked your interest in studying law and becoming a professor? Were there particular experiences in your early life that informed your decisions regarding your career path? Do you have advice for younger women who want to pursue a career in law? Chua: I only went to law school, because I couldn’t think of anything else to do — and knew I didn’t want to go to Medical School (like my parents were hoping). I became a professor completely by luck and serendipity, so I always tell younger women you can’t plan everything! Sometimes just go with the flow. I’m personally not a “natural” at law, but I’m still glad I pursued a career in law, because I actually think it is a very flexible degree. You can use it to practice law — but you can also use a legal degree to go into business, government, policymaking, teaching, public interest work, writing — almost anything! Suggested for you __gads This cookie is set by Google and stored under the name dounleclick.com. This cookie is used to track how many times users see a particular advert which helps in measuring the success of the campaign and calculate the revenue generated by the campaign. These cookies can only be read from the domain that it is set on so it will not track any data while browsing through another sites. _ga This cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, campaign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assigns a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors. _gid This cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the wbsite is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages viisted in an anonymous form. _omappvp The cookie is set to identify new vs returning users. The cookie is used in conjunction with _omappvs cookie to determine whether a user is new or returning. _omappvs The cookie is used to in conjunction with the _omappvp cookies. If the cookies are set, the user is a returning user. If neither of the cookies are set, the user is a new user. GPS This cookie is set by Youtube and registers a unique ID for tracking users based on their geographical location Cookie __qca This cookie is associated with Quantcast and is used for collecting anonymized data to analyze log data from different websites to create reports that enables the website owners and advertisers provide ads for the appropriate audience segments. _fbp This cookie is set by Facebook to deliver advertisement when they are on Facebook or a digital platform powered by Facebook advertising after visiting this website. everest_g_v2 The cookie is set under eversttech.net domain. The purpose of the cookie is to map clicks to other events on the client's website. fr The cookie is set by Facebook to show relevant advertisments to the users and measure and improve the advertisements. The cookie also tracks the behavior of the user across the web on sites that have Facebook pixel or Facebook social plugin. IDE Used by Google DoubleClick and stores information about how the user uses the website and any other advertisement before visiting the website. This is used to present users with ads that are relevant to them according to the user profile. mc personalization_id This cookie is set by twitter.com. It is used integrate the sharing features of this social media. It also stores information about how the user uses the website for tracking and targeting. PUBMDCID This cookie is set by pubmatic.com. The cookie stores an ID that is used to display ads on the users' browser. TDCPM The cookie is set by CloudFare service to store a unique ID to identify a returning users device which then is used for targeted advertising. TDID The cookie is set by CloudFare service to store a unique ID to identify a returning users device which then is used for targeted advertising. test_cookie This cookie is set by doubleclick.net. The purpose of the cookie is to determine if the users' browser supports cookies. uid This cookie is used to measure the number and behavior of the visitors to the website anonymously. The data includes the number of visits, average duration of the visit on the website, pages visited, etc. for the purpose of better understanding user preferences for targeted advertisments. uuid To optimize ad relevance by collecting visitor data from multiple websites such as what pages have been loaded. uuidc This cookie is used to stores information about how the user uses the website such as what pages have been loaded and any other advertisement before visiting the website. This data is used to provide users with relevant ads. VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE This cookie is set by Youtube. Used to track the information of the embedded YouTube videos on a website.

Amy Chua Investments

1 Investments

Amy Chua has made 1 investments. Their latest investment was in Junzi Kitchen as part of their Seed VC - III on October 10, 2019.

CBI Logo

Amy Chua Investments Activity

investments chart

Date

Round

Company

Amount

New?

Co-Investors

Sources

10/12/2019

Seed VC - III

Junzi Kitchen

$5M

Yes

10

Date

10/12/2019

Round

Seed VC - III

Company

Junzi Kitchen

Amount

$5M

New?

Yes

Co-Investors

Sources

10

CB Insights uses Cookies

CBI websites generally use certain cookies to enable better interactions with our sites and services. Use of these cookies, which may be stored on your device, permits us to improve and customize your experience. You can read more about your cookie choices at our privacy policy here. By continuing to use this site you are consenting to these choices.