Well, stop it
Check yourself before you wreck yourself: Stock expert reckons you should be happy when prices dip. Here’s why. Latest posts by Tony Yoo ( see all )
Image source: Getty Images
A prominent stock commentator has warned of complacency setting in among retail investors after the spectacular post- COVID share market recovery. “Watch this tendency because the best returns have been achieved by investors who adopt the opposite approach.”
He referred to a former colleague who taught junior fund managers “to become more bullish as the market fell”. “Easy to say and very difficult to do,” said Stevenson. “The growing appetite for risk-taking in obscure and volatile assets like cryptocurrencies suggests people are chasing growth. That’s worrying.”
Invest when you don’t want to
Buying shares when everyone else is selling is the best way to nab returns. But Stevenson acknowledges this is difficult, even for professionals. “Are you an emotional investor? This is a silly question. Of course you are – you are a human being.”
The way to remove the emotion out of buying is to do it “regularly and systematically”, according to Stevenson. “It makes you invest when you don’t want to – invariably the best time to do so.”
Have some cash in hand for volatile times
Aside from quarantining enough cash for day-to-day living and emergencies, Stevenson encouraged punters to set aside some capital during the good times. This is so you can buy up when bad times hit. “If you were fully invested in March 2020 you would have enjoyed the subsequent recovery – but how much better if you could have added to your investments at bargain basement prices?” Stevenson said. “Having some cash to hand (separate from what you’ve put aside to cover expenses) is essential if you are to benefit from Mr Market’s mood swings.”
How much can you stomach a downturn? There are many first-time stock investors who are currently experiencing a downturn in their portfolio for the first time. Stevenson reminded punters accepting the unavoidable share market downs goes hand-in-hand with enjoying the great highs. But everyone has a different tolerance for volatility . “You also need to be realistic about what you can, and cannot, live with,” he said. “How well do you know yourself? Twelve years into a bull market , it is tempting to think that we have a greater tolerance for risk than we actually do. You will find out what your real risk appetite is when your portfolio is worth 30% less than it is today.”
Where to invest $1,000 right now
When investing expert Scott Phillips has a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the flagship Motley Fool Share Advisor newsletter he has run for more than eight years has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more. *
Scott just revealed what he believes are the five best ASX stocks for investors to buy right now. These stocks are trading at dirt-cheap prices and Scott thinks they are great buys right now.

Are you more optimistic when the share market rises? Well, stop it

Dozens of protesters sustained serious injuries from teargas, rubber bullets, stun grenades, used by police to disperse crowds during the George Floyd protests
Last modified on Wed 12 Aug 2020 04.01 EDT
Federal law enforcement officers fire teargas to disperse protesters during a demonstration in Portland, Oregon in July.Photograph: Caitlin Ochs/Reuters
Six days after George Floyd was killed by a white policeman, thousands of protesters in Minneapolis took over an on-ramp leading to the University of Minnesota. It was a warm evening, a few hours before the 8pm curfew set in. The crowd advanced toward a bridge leading to the university where Stevenson, 25, had recently graduated from with a Masters of international development. He linked arms with two other protesters and together, they made their way to the front. Stevenson had attended several other protests throughout the week where police presence had been minimal. This was different. As he approached the bridge, Stevenson saw demonstrators retreating from the front line, their faces covered with milk to alleviate teargas burn. Once on the bridge, he counted 20 police vehicles and in front of them, officers in riot gear. The crowd began to chant, “Hands up Don’t Shoot.”
Without warning, a stun grenade launched over Stevenson’s left shoulder. He watched it explode over the crowd and then heard a pop – his head jerked backwards. He reached instinctively for his face. His eyebrow, his nose, his cheekbone had become soft and compressed, like a hard-boiled egg cracked with a teaspoon. Blinded, Stevenson stumbled to the back of the protest and sat down on a curb, blood dribbling from his eye socket. He was sweating, terrified. He kept touching his face, which was covered in a jelly-like substance. “I’ve lost my eye,” he thought to himself. “This is my worst nightmare.”
Stevenson recounted this story to me on the phone weeks after the incident, his voice steady as he listed the extent of his injuries: a fractured nose, a fractured forehead, many tiny breaks around his left eye socket and cheek bone, a ruptured eyeball. Soren Stevenson, who lost his left eye to a rubber bullet during the George Floyd protests. Photograph: Nina Robinson/The Guardian
These injuries, which Stevenson’s ophthalmologist compared to those suffered in severe motor accidents, were caused by a rubber bullet, a crowd control weapon that police and weapons manufacturers deem “ less lethal ”. Along with teargas, stun grenades and water cannons, these weapons have long been used to disperse crowds during civil unrest around the world. During recent protests, which spread across every state of the US in the months after Floyd was killed and have continued in intervals ever since, the weapons have come under scrutiny, with dozens of protesters sustaining serious injuries . Much attention has already been given to the immediate physical trauma inflicted by those weapons. But for Stevenson, and many other protesters who have been in the firing line in the past month, the impacts will reverberate throughout their lives. When we spoke, Stevenson had just had his left eye removed and his eye-lid sewed shut. He told me that seeing out of only one eye makes him feel dizzy and nauseous. “It hurts to even look at my phone screen,” he said. “I spend a lot of time with my eyes closed.”
After speaking to Stevenson, it struck me that the term “less lethal” isn’t only a euphemism for the harm caused at the moment of impact, but also conceals the long-term trauma lingering afterwards. I reached out to a number of people injured during previous protest movements, wanting to gather what they know about the scars of resistance, those that remain once the rest of the world moves on. •••
Many of the so-called non-lethal crowd control weapons that are used to disperse protests today have their origins in colonial policing. In the 19th century, British forces used baton rounds – rudimentary wooden bullets fashioned from the end of broom handles – to quell civil unrest in Singapore and Hong Kong, and then decades later, in Northern Ireland, where wood was replaced with rubber and plastic. For all the brutality of these weapons – during the Troubles, for instance, rubber and plastic bullets killed 17 people including eight children – there was a wide scale adoption of the technologies by local law enforcement in the US throughout the 20th century. Police departments across the country deployed teargas and baton rounds on labor movement protestors in the 1930s, and again on anti-Vietnam war demonstrators in the 1970s. Today, police departments in cities across America are armed with high-tech crowd control arsenals of flash bang grenades, beanbag rounds filled with birdshot, pepper balls fired rapidly from machine guns. While these weapons have become accepted by law enforcement as a legitimate method for managing civil unrest, Anna Feigenbaum, who has written a history of teargas , argues that the way they are used domestically echoes how they were deployed during colonial and military struggles. “These weapons were invented as a way to not have to engage with people’s claims to human rights,” she told me. “And they are still deployed to both physically and psychologically destroy people engaging in resistance.”
Vanessa Dundon at the Dakota Access oil pipeline protest in southern North Dakota in 2016. Photograph: Blake Nicholson/AP
Vanessa Dundon, a 35-year-old Navajo woman and mother of four, has experienced this firsthand. On a cold November evening in 2016, Dundon responded to a call for help from an abandoned bridge immediately north of the Oceti Šakowiŋ camp, where she was protesting the Dakota Access pipeline. At the bridge, a handful of protesters were towing two burnt-out trucks to clear the way for emergency vehicles. Dundon noticed a journalist standing near a line of police in formation behind a barbed-wire barricade. Having seen previous clashes turn violent, she walked over to advise the journalist to move to a safe place at the side of the road. As she approached, the police fired teargas canisters, striking Dundon directly in the face from a distance of around 20ft. As she turned to run, Dundon was hit with a rubber bullet in the back of her left leg and fell to the ground. Two protesters picked her up and carried Dundon to a nearby medical yurt where volunteers placed butterfly sutures over her left eye. “It felt like my whole eye had split open and my eyeball was hanging out,” she told me. “I’m a strong woman and can endure pain, but I was so scared.”
For the next few weeks, Dundon was in and out of hospital. The blunt force of the tear gas canister detached her retina and she had three surgeries to have it re-attached. She has since regained some vision – vague outlines and colors – but the injury still causes her pain and distress. At a checkup earlier this year, her ophthalmologist delivered the bad news that excess blood accumulating behind her eyeball is increasing pressure on her optic nerve, substantially increasing the risk of glaucoma or permanent blindness in years to come. More painful than the physical injury, Dundon told me, is the fact that she can no longer engage in activism. Before Standing Rock, she had lived a relatively sheltered life on the Navajo reservation. At the camp, she met elders who told her stories about the American Indian Movement protests of the 1960s and 1970s. At Standing Rock, Dundon had been inducted into the movement and was given a new activist name, Sioux Z Dezbah. She had plans to continue her activism and advocacy in her community. “It was there that I woke up and started to realize that if we want to have change, we need to demand it,” she said. Vanessa Dundon says she can no longer drive, has no peripheral vision on her left side, and get anxious around crowds and loud spaces. Photograph: Mark Boster/Los Angeles Times/Getty Images
Her injury has made this vision feel out of reach. “I can’t drive. I have no peripheral vision on my left side. Loud and crowded places make me anxious,” Dundon told me, adding that many other Native American activists from Standing Rock have similarly been incapacitated by their injuries. “Because we can’t go out there anymore no one wants to know about us,” she said. “It’s like we’ve become invisible.”
•••
When protesters are severely injured with crowd control weapons, police departments often avoid culpability by stating that individual officers failed to follow the rules of deployment. A similar strategy is employed by weapon manufacturers , who assert that if their products were used as instructed, serious injury would be avoided. But according to Feigenbaum, this type of deflection is deeply cynical and misleading. Over the years, she has attended many crowd control weapon expos and has found that law enforcement agencies and munitions manufacturers both cultivate a narrative that emphasizes police vulnerability and underplays how dangerous the weapons really are. “This attitude then plays out in the militarized response to protests,” she said. “The officers feel that it is reasonable and relatively safe for them to deploy any amount of force on people.”
Rachel Lederman, a human rights attorney based in the Bay Area, told me that this narrative also makes it harder for victims to seek justice. “The legal system is influenced by the police relating that they are in danger and therefore have to use force,” she said. “Even when someone is terribly injured, they come up against a certain bias that leans against protesters and towards police.”
Lederman, who is currently the lead attorney in Vanessa Dundon’s as-yet-to-be-heard case against North Dakota police officials, added that even when compensation is awarded, plaintiffs may not feel like justice has been served. In 2011, her former client, Scott Olsen, was struck in the head with a beanbag round while protesting at an Occupy Oakland rally, the impact fracturing his skull and spinal vertebrae, while causing significant damage to the left frontal lobe of his brain. Olsen, a Marine Corps veteran who served two tours of Iraq, was put under a medically-induced coma, after which he was unable to speak for several weeks. In the months after the injury, Olsen went back to his job in IT but was fired shortly after, when his bosses found that he was unable to keep a schedule or complete certain basic tasks. In 2014, Olsen was paid $4.5m in a settlement with the City of Oakland, after which he moved to rural Wisconsin, where he now works as a farmer keeping chickens and honeybees. Although his bones have fully healed, Olsen, now 32, still suffers from the impact of his brain injury. As well as struggling to maintain a regular sleeping schedule, he forgets people soon after meeting them and often finds himself walking into a room and not remembering why. “I know this happens to everybody, but it happens to me on almost daily basis,” he told me. Neurologists have told him that he is now at a higher risk of epileptic seizures, early onset dementia, and other cognitive disorders. “It’s been helpful for me to have the compensation from the settlement,” he told me. “But it feels hollow without the officers being personally punished for what they did to my life.”
Crowd control weapons do not only traumatize individuals; in regions and communities where there is ongoing civil unrest, the long term impact of violence can ramify across populations. A study published earlier this year, found that the prevalence of depression in Hong Kong residents aged 18 years and older increased five-fold after last year’s protests, while PTSD symptoms were estimated to be six times higher – impacting almost 32% of those surveyed. Justin Hansford, a Howard University professor of law, was a key participant in the 2014 Black Lives Matter protests in Ferguson, where he volunteered on the front lines as a legal observer. Photograph: Nate Palmer/Nate Palmer for The Guardian
Justin Hansford, professor of law at Howard University, has himself witnessed how violent responses to protest can shape the life of a community. The 37-year old human rights lawyer was a key participant in the 2014 Black Lives Matter protests in Ferguson, where he volunteered on the front lines as a legal observer. During almost 300 days of protest, he was teargassed, threatened, surveilled, arrested and saw friends severely injured by rubber bullets. Hansford left St Louis in 2015 – after winning a Fulbright scholarship to study the legal career of Nelson Mandela – but the trauma of the protests lingers. Stressful situations and expressions of anger trigger flashbacks. Manifestations of trauma also show up in inflammation and physical pain in his body. Sleep has been difficult. He has recurring nightmares of friends being executed by police. Hansford manages his symptoms with therapy and meditation, but he knows others have found it more difficult to cope, particularly if they still have contact with St Louis police. Bassem Masri, a Palestinian-American activist arrested alongside Hansford in 2014, died of a heart attack following a fentanyl overdose in 2018. (Masri is one of six prominent Ferguson activists who have died since the protests.) “Given what I myself went through, I have no doubt that Bassem’s experience at Ferguson contributed to his death,” Hansford told me. “I know I have been tempted to find ways to escape reality and deal with all the stress.”
The persistent, reverberating trauma of the protests, Hansford added, is not evenly distributed across St Louis, but is borne disproportionately by the black community. “For us, every protest felt like we were in a war, like we were under siege,” he said. “But then I’d drive through some white suburb and they were living like a regular Sunday afternoon.”
Ruth-Thompson Miller, a visiting professor of sociology at Vassar College, told me that this has been the case throughout US history. While conducting research for a book about the legacy of the Jim Crow era, Thompson-Miller interviewed over 100 people who lived through segregation. She found that violence was more widespread across black communities than typically acknowledged, and that the experience of this violence continues to have long-lasting mental and physical health consequences for black people. A surprising finding of her research, though, is that those who actively participated in the Civil Rights Movement had better health outcomes over a lifetime than those who did not. “They did experience violence on all sorts of levels while protesting or engaging in activism, but over the years this made them more resilient and empowered,” she told me. “The trauma was, to some extent, mitigated by demanding and imagining a more just future. “
Thompson-Miller’s findings resonate with Hansford, who told me that he now has the capacity to withstand intimidation and pressure. “I’ve had that experience and now I know I can survive it,” he said. “But it’s unfair that our communities always have to show up and bear this burden.”
•••
If in the past the intense violence of crowd control weapons was known largely by police and protesters, today, it is dispatched in intimate detail on social media. Over the past month, photos and videos of protestors choking on tear gas or faces bloodied from rubber bullets have haunted the platforms – forcing members of the public who might never have encountered police violence to confront the damage being done to those exercising their democratic rights in the streets. This heightened exposure has, in turn, led to greater scrutiny on the continued use of these weapons. Congressional lawmakers and city councils are calling for a ban on the use of teargas. The American Academy of Ophthalmology issued a public statement calling for the immediate end to the use of rubber bullets to control or disperse protester. “Americans have the right to speak and congregate publicly and should be able to exercise that right without the fear of blindness,” the official statement read. “You shouldn’t have to choose between your vision and your voice.”
For Stevenson and countless others, this reckoning has come too late. The initial pain and nausea he experienced in the days after being shot has subsided. Now he is coming to terms with a life he never imagined. “I’m not a very religious person,” he told. “But I reached out to a local pastor, just to help me make sense of the world.”
As with every other injured protester I spoke to, Stevenson does not regret participating in the protest. “I feel like my injury will forever remind me that we need justice around police violence and race in the country,” he said. Dundon sees her scar in a similarly symbolic way. “I always tell people, even though I lost an eye, I see things more clearly now,” she said. When we spoke, Stevenson was waiting to undergo what would hopefully be his final procedure. Doctors would take out the rubber prosthetic in his eye socket and replace it with a glass eye. He had been speaking with a lawyer about bringing suit against the Minneapolis police department. In the meantime, his family had started raising funds for his medical bills. If this future was somewhat daunting, Stevenson tried to stay positive. He told me that he was chatting online with other protesters who had recently lost an eye from so-called less lethal weaponry. “We have tentative plans to go on a camping trip together,” he said, laughing. “Just a bunch of Cyclops out in the woods.”
Topics

After the protests, lingering trauma: the scars of ‘non-lethal’ weapons

UPDATED 6:45 PM EST Nov 02, 2015
Livewire: Todd Dykes reports from Colorado
A former mortgage broker, Stevenson grew up in southwestern Ohio. "I'm from Cincinnati. I was born and raised there," Stevenson said. "After high school in Anderson Township I left (and) went to school in Boulder at CU. "
Because of the experience he gained while watching others grow weed as a student at CU-Boulder, Stevenson is now considered a top-flight pot grower, a fact that is not lost on a group of marijuana investors in Butler County. "My title currently is, probably, head cultivation officer for our company," Stevenson said. "I've been a head grower for the last 6 years in the (marijuana) industry, since its inception. It's been great. I basically have learned how, over the years, to bring a plant from start to finish and create the greatest quality product there is. "
Because he's so good at growing marijuana, Stevenson is now part of a company that wants to cultivate the highest quality marijuana plants possible. The key, Stevenson said, is that he was able to design the grow facility that his company plans to use. "We have created an extremely high-end cultivation facility basically designed by a grower, which is a huge aspect in this industry because before that, they were just kind of shoehorned in," he said. "I was able to create the entire plan, decide the lights, every single element that went into this building. "
Since he's so good at what he does, a high school friend from Cincinnati helped connect Stevenson to a group of ResponsibleOhio investors who hope to launch a grow facility in Butler County if Ohio voters approve Issue 3. "They've come out and visited a few times, and they've seen this facility, and they're really impressed," Stevenson said. "I think (the Butler County investors) realize that our goals are the same as theirs as far as a really good, clean, healthy product. "
If Ohio voters say yes to legal pot, Stevenson said he's ready to roll up his sleeves and help the Butler County investment group start growing premium bud. "I want to be able to help bring that good quality, clean product for, you know, the Ohio consumer base," he said. Stevenson knows that Issue 3 has come under fire, especially from pro-pot advocates who don't like the notion of limiting the number of grow sites statewide. Despite those concerns, he fully supports Issue 3, which is not surprising, because in today's climate, expert pot growers stand to make a fair amount of money digging in the dirt wherever marijuana is legal.


Colorado marijuana expert hopes to come home, grow pot in Ohio

3
Comments
WBC light heavyweight champion Adonis "Superman" Stevenson was too fast and skilled for the rugged, but clumsy Sakio Bika. Stevenson scored an unanimous decision on Saturday in Quebec City on Saturday afternoon in the main event of the premier of the Premier Boxing Champions series on CBS. The scorecards were a little closer than they should have been, but the right man won. Philippe St-Martin of BoxRec Canada has the official numbers:
It's now official @AdonisSuperman wins via UD12 (115-111,116-110,115-110 ) vs Sakio Bika. Stevenson retains his @WBCBoxing belt #boxing
— Philippe St-Martin (@BoxRec_Canada) April 4, 2015
Throughout the fight, Bika was victimized by his awkward footwork and Stevenson's nasty straight left hand. While he appeared to be heard on several occasions, its hard to say for sure with Bika because the Cameroonian is often off balance. In the sixth round, Stevenson was given credit for a knockdown that the replay proved should have been ruled a slip. However, there was no mistaking whether Bika was hurt in the ninth round. A destructive and short straight-left hand sent Bika to the canvas in a heap. He would rise to his feet, and didn't appear to be badly hurt, but the knockdown punctuated a dominating performance by Stevenson. Superman landed at will and dictated the action. Coming into the fight, Stevenson's chin was seen as a potential weakness. He's been stopped by Darnell Boone and floored by Andrzej Fonfara in his career. Bika had some moments in the 12th round. He landed a few clubbing right hands, but none of them found the mark squarely enough to truly test Stevenson's questionable chin. All night long, Bika had no answer for Stevenson's left-hand dominant attack. ESPN's Dan Rafael picked up on the trend after the fifth round. Bika has no clue how to get away from Stevenson's left hand. 5-0 Stevenson. #StevensonBika #boxing
— Dan Rafael (@danrafaelespn) April 4, 2015
Shortly after the fight ended, PBC on CBS analyst Paulie Malignaggi quickly transitioned from his duties offering color commentary to summarize Superman's performance on Twitter. Another successful defense for Adonis, great chin & heart from Bika. Can't wait to see what's next for Adonis ... #PBConCBS @premierboxing
— Paul Malignaggi (@PaulMalignaggi) April 4, 2015
When the fight was over, Stevenson also had to fight through CBS' Brent Stover calling him "Kevin" in the post-fight interview. It was one of those: "did he just call him Kevin" moments. I had to rewind to be sure I wasn't hearing things. Sportz Visionz captured the slip. UmmâŚ dude's name is Adonis http://t.co/e3Y6W8YgvR
— Sportz Visionz (@SportzVisionz) April 4, 2015
Surprisingly, Stover didn't ask him about WBA, IBF and WBO 175-pound champion Sergey Kovalev. Many believe Stevenson has been ducking the highly anticipated bout with the powerful Russian. Despite what his critics say, Stevenson insists he wants to face Kovalev. Per the Los Angeles Daily News , Stevenson said this before the bout with Bika:
“I don’t have any problem with fighting Kovalev. I will fight anybody and now there’s a chance to fight Kovalev. I will let my manager Al Haymon take care of that.”
Fight fans certainly hope Stevenson is true to his word and that Haymon can create the light heavyweight bout that the boxing community wants to see. At this point, it seems to be the only relevant bout to make in the division. Follow Brian Mazique on Twitter
 


Adonis Stevenson vs. Sakio Bika: Winner, Scorecard and Reaction

Fighting Bika and Public Perception
Eric Bolte-USA TODAY Sports
Bika is just one of the adversaries Stevenson faces in the sport of boxing. While he is not a joke of a world champion, Stevenson is not the most respected titleholder. The first thing many people in the boxing community think of when Stevenson's name is mentioned is his perceived unwillingness to face WBA, WBO and IBF champion Sergey Kovalev. Tweets like this one from TalkinBoxing are common:
Stevenson doesn't want Kovalev the WBC ordered it so he will play it off as if he has been chasing it #Superduck
— TalkinBoxing (@TalkinBoxing) March 29, 2015
With Kovalev having recently dispatched Jean Pascal, another Haitian-born Canadian in his last fight, the pull for Stevenson to face the Russian champ is even stronger. It seemed the two were on a collision course when both fighters were performing under the HBO umbrella. However, Stevenson bolted to sign with Showtime and Al Haymon, thus complicating the chances of the champions unifying the belts. Per Marco Villegas of Fight Hub and The Boxing Channel, the WBC has ordered a purse bid for an eventual Kovalev-Stevenson unification bout:
Seems the WBC has ordered a purse bid for a Stevenson-Kovalev fight. Bid to take place April 17 in order to determine the promoter
— marcos villegas (@heyitsmarcosv) March 27, 2015
We'll see if it ever happens. Meanwhile, there's a fairly formidable foe on tap for Stevenson in a bout that could be a trap if the champion isn't focused on the task at hand. Stevenson is coming off a fifth-round KO win over Dmitry Sukhotsky in Dec. 2014. It was his fourth successful title defense since winning the championship by knocking out Chad Dawson in June 2013. Another Chance to Make a Mark
Joe Camporeale-USA TODAY Sports
The Scorpion has had plenty of chances to land a signature win over a big-name fighter, but he's failed up to this point in his career. Bika has faced and lost to the likes of Andre Ward, Lucian Bute, Joe Calzaghe and Anthony Dirrell. In fact, Bika hasn't fought since losing his world title to Dirrell in Aug. 2014 in a unanimous decision. He had previously kept the title after escaping with a draw against Dirrell in their first meeting in Dec. 2013. At 35 years old, Bika is attempting to come up in weight and challenge the 37-year-old Stevenson for what would be the Scorpion's second world title. To make matters tougher, Stevenson is a southpaw. Bika hasn't had the best luck against lefties in his career. Three of his six losses have come to southpaws. Per Lem Satterfield of PremierBoxingChampions.com , Bika believes he's ready for the challenge: "I have learned a lot fighting the best southpaws in the world. I will fight my own fight Saturday and not be drawn into Adonis' game plan. "
 
Prediction
There's a clear skill, length and athleticism advantage for the champion in this fight. Stevenson is quicker, has a six-inch reach advantage and has better footwork. However, Bika is probably the tougher fighter. Stevenson cannot allow Bika to draw him into a brawl. The challenger can be wild and unorthodox. He seeks to muck up the action and likes to engage in rough-and-tumble bouts. Stevenson has to remain poised, use his jab and allow his edge in skills to carry him. If he does that, he'll win an easy decision. There's also a chance he could become the first man to stop the rugged Cameroonian. Bika is not only stepping up in weight, but he's also doing it against one of the more devastating punchers in the sport. We don't know how well Bika will take the punch of a strong puncher at 175 pounds. Follow Brian Mazique on Twitter.


Adonis Stevenson vs. Sakio Bika: Fight Time, Date, Live Stream and TV Info

Stevenson helps all types of nonprofits and associations achieve greater success: colleges/universities, hospitals and other health-related organizations, schools, museums, Chambers of Commerce, libraries, United Way agencies, youth organizations and more. It publishes six monthly nationally acclaimed newsletters with subscribers throughout the U.S., Canada and other foreign countries. Available digitally and in print, the newsletters are sold on an annual subscription basis and focus on specific aspects of nonprofit and association management. The company also publishes manuals and special reports and offers several online events throughout the year presented by proven experts from the nonprofit community.

Date	12/11/2012
Round	Acquired
Amount
Investors	Wiley
Valuation
Revenue	0 FY undefined
Sources	1

Wells Fargo Success Story

3M Success Story

Platform Overview

Stevenson

Stevenson Funding, Stevenson Valuation & Stevenson Revenue

Discover the right solution for your team