StageCrowdfunding | Alive
Last Raised$370K | 5 yrs ago
About Project EVO
Project EVO has created the EVO Flow System Planner. It comes in four different formats - Alchemist, Architect, Oracle, and Explorer - one of which is matched to your unique brain type after you complete EVO's Brain Type Assesment test. Each planner contains daily, weekly, monthly, and note pages to help you stay organized while tackling your to-do list(s).
Missing: Project EVO's Product Demo & Case Studies
Promote your product offering to tech buyers.
Reach 1000s of buyers who use CB Insights to identify vendors, demo products, and make purchasing decisions.
Missing: Project EVO's Product & Differentiators
Don’t let your products get skipped. Buyers use our vendor rankings to shortlist companies and drive requests for proposals (RFPs).
Latest Project EVO News
Nov 24, 2020
Published: November 24th, 2020 “Marketing” and “technicality” go hand in hand when companies try to grab your money. While what’s written on the box can be technically achieved, experience often contradicts expectations. The duo flows rife in hardware advertisement. Examples are aplenty: some laptop’s advertised battery life can only be achieved under restrictive conditions, such as with Wi-Fi off and at the lowest brightness. Once unplugged, some laptops switch to a lower power profile to extend battery life at the cost of performance. The more tech-savvy will know to toggle the profile back, but an average user may need to go through a Google search before they arrive at the solution. Monitor specs are also often filled with misleading specs, just watch this excellent video by Engadget . Fortunately, product reviewers can test devices’ actual performance by using synthetic and real-world benchmarks. But while these benchmarks build a relative performance hierarchy, their numeric results are often as nebulous to a buyer as the advertisements they aim to dispel. Moreover, grasping the technical details requires vigorous research, and hours more to scour for alternatives. The extra work is less than desirable; no one wants to toil over a purchase. This brews an understandable frustration. Consumers just need an assurance that the product will work as advertised. In 2019, Intel launched Project Athena to demystify both marketing and technical jargon in one fell swoop. With it, Intel created Key Experience Indicators (KEIs) that better reflect user experience. The certification guideline set parameters for connectivity, responsiveness, and battery life based on a realistic use case. It also specified port type, display resolution, physical design, and the inclusion of an Intel processor. Approved products get an “Engineered for Mobile Performance” sticker on their boxes, a reassurance at a glance. One year later, Intel announced Project Evo, an expanded certificate based on Athena. Alongside a flashier “Intel Evo” sticker came new conditions including Intel 11th-gen processors , Iris Xe graphics, Intel DL Boost+, GNA 2.0, optional 5G, and Thunderbolt 4. All the specifications converge into four key KEI targets: Consistent responsiveness on battery. Nine or more hours of real-world battery life on laptops with full HD display. Four or more hours of battery life in a 30-minute charge on laptops with a full HD display. Evo’s testing methodology was also amended to encompass local and cloud workload interactions. Intel said that people often have multiple cloud accounts logged in while at work. As such, Evo’s certification now measures the device’s KEI against 25 tasks, up from Athena’s 15. What does an Evo laptop look like? By virtue of its stringent requirements, Evo certified laptops naturally tend to land in the higher-end. Acer’s Swift 5 is one of such devices: thin, light, and equipped with an Intel 11th-gen Tiger Lake processor, the 13.3-inch Acer Swift 5 targets productivity on the go. We were lucky enough to try it out over a weekend. I thought it was polycarbonate at first, but the Acer Swift 5 actually features a magnesium alloy body painted in grey and gold. It was far more resistant to fingerprints than most other chassis I’ve tried so far. On paper, the Acer Swift 5 meets all of Evo’s requirements: a 1080p display, Thunderbolt 4, 16GB of dual-channel DDR4 memory, thin bezels, Wi-Fi 6, and the Intel Core i7-1165G7 with Iris Xe graphics. It also comes with a 1TB PCIe SSD. The Swift 5 comes with a healthy combination of 2x USB 3 type-A ports, 1x USB Type-C/Thunderbolt 4 port, 1x headphone jack., and an HDMI port. The USB-C port supports the USB power delivery specification as well. Because it isn’t yet available in Canada, we can only speculate its cost based on the previous generation. The Acer Swift 5 with Intel’s 10th Gen Ice Lake processor, 16GB of RAM, and 512GB of storage costs CA$1,499 at Canada Computers. Expect a similarly configured new edition to cost around that ballpark. No matter how much Intel lauds its KEIs, benchmarks are here to stay. Intel’s Tiger Lake processor, based on the 10nm+ node, showed good performance in Geekbench and Cinebench. And as per the Evo requirement, it maintained its performance when on battery and when hooked up to an outlet. Power condition 4710 Intel’s Xe Iris graphics was excellent, producing very high results in 3DMark TimeSpy for integrated graphics. For comparison, this is roughly twice the score of Intel’s Iris Pro integrated graphics in its 10th-gen processors. Project Evo only needs a 1080p panel to meet its minimum requirement, and that’s what the Swift 5 came with. Granted, a higher resolution display would consume more power. While I was slightly annoyed at the “screen-door” mesh effect caused by the gaps between pixels, it took only a day to become accustomed to it. Personally, I value battery life over a high-resolution display, but 1080p is the lowest resolution I’d accept for a 14-inch laptop. I didn’t expect the Acer Swift 5 to crash partway through PC Mark’s battery test. Because I ran the test on the last night of my loan period, I was unable to complete the battery test again. Before it crashed, however, the Swift 5 managed for 7 hours at 250 nits, the brightness target Intel tested its Evo candidates at. It had about 20 per cent of battery left. While Project Evo drew solid baselines for hardware, I wish it had mandated a 1080p webcam. As capable as it was, the Swift 5’s grainy 720p webcam was a major shortfall. There are plenty of intake vents at the base to keep the laptop cool. The elevator display hinge also props up the base to create a wider gap at the base for air to flow through. Another headache is the laptop’s copious bloatware. Intel’s Evo spec doesn’t have any software requirements, so manufacturers are still free to clog the hard drive with all the bloat they want. I uninstalled 11 pieces of extraneous software in one cursory pass of the application list. They not only hogs needless disk space but also wastes time to scrape away. Final thoughts Again, Intel’s Project Evo is really supposed to add confidence at a glance for an average consumer and abets benchmark numbers in more technical reviews. In a sense, Intel is vouching for the advertised performance on the box, and consumers won’t have to worry about the manufacturers cheating. The quality assurance helps Intel as well. No component maker would want to mingle their products with short expectations and subpar experiences, especially for one as important as the processor, which is often synonymous with performance–even for a layman. That’s not to say devices without the Evo standard don’t meet the performance targets they claim to hit. There are many devices that already meet Project Evo’s demands, and can likely be certified just by submitting it to Intel’s labs. For some, it’s only a matter of getting a sticker, while others need redesigns according to the specifications. My first run-in with a Project Evo-certified laptop left a good impression. With consistent performance, lightweight, good build quality, and a great selection of ports, the Acer Swift 5 was definitely a reliable daily driver. More importantly, it hits all the guidelines laid out by Evo. I just wish its webcam was better and that it came with less bloat. Project Evo is an iterative guideline that will continue to be revised as newer technologies develop and workloads change. As of now, there have been more than 20 Evo-certified laptops, and its future is looking quite exciting. Would you recommend this article? 0
Project EVO Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
When was Project EVO founded?
Project EVO was founded in 2016.
Where is Project EVO's headquarters?
Project EVO's headquarters is located at San Diego.
What is Project EVO's latest funding round?
Project EVO's latest funding round is Crowdfunding.
How much did Project EVO raise?
Project EVO raised a total of $370K.
Who are the investors of Project EVO?
Investors of Project EVO include Kickstarter.
Who are Project EVO's competitors?
Competitors of Project EVO include Zeda.io and 4 more.
Compare Project EVO to Competitors
ClickUp develops a project management platform. It offers documents, reminders, goals, and calendars in a customizable environment. It allows team members to stay in integration. It was founded in 2017 and is based in San Diego, California.
Productboard operates as a customer-centric product management platform. The platform builds roadmaps, centralizes feedback, validates ideas, and more. It was founded in 2014 and is based in San Francisco, California.
Height offers a digital platform to manage projects across engineering, product, design and other teams. The company was founded in 2018 and is based in New York, New York.
Zeda.io makes product development simpler and smarter through its online tool. It helps teams define their roadmap, manage features, create wireframes, define personas & releases, manage user flows, and more from a single platform. The platform is used by product managers around the world. Zeda.io was founded in 2020 and is based in Bengaluru, India.
Buildly develops a cloud application platform designed to help product and development teams. The company provides development teams with tools and processes to help clients build cloud-native products. It was founded in 2019 and is based in Portland, Oregon.
Aha! develops web-based product roadmap software.
Discover the right solution for your team
The CB Insights tech market intelligence platform analyzes millions of data points on vendors, products, partnerships, and patents to help your team find their next technology solution.