Search company, investor...

Founded Year

2012

Stage

Dead | Dead

Total Raised

$20.01M

Revenue

$0000 

About Phytelligence

Phytelligence is an agricultural biotechnology company that utilizes growing techniques to provide quality crops, Phytelligence enables higher grower profit by increasing speed to harvest and reducing input costs.

Headquarters Location

221 1st Ave. W Suite 350

Seattle, Washington, 98119,

United States

(206) 244-7783

Loading...

Loading...

Research containing Phytelligence

Get data-driven expert analysis from the CB Insights Intelligence Unit.

CB Insights Intelligence Analysts have mentioned Phytelligence in 2 CB Insights research briefs, most recently on Dec 12, 2023.

Expert Collections containing Phytelligence

Expert Collections are analyst-curated lists that highlight the companies you need to know in the most important technology spaces.

Phytelligence is included in 1 Expert Collection, including Agriculture Technology (Agtech).

A

Agriculture Technology (Agtech)

2,067 items

Companies in the agtech space, such as equipment manufacturers, surveying drones, geospatial intelligence firms, and farm management platforms

Latest Phytelligence News

Federal Circuit Finds Agreement To Agree Not Enforceable

Sep 29, 2020

To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: <iframe frameborder="1" height="620" scrolling="auto" src="//www.jdsupra.com/post/contentViewerEmbed.aspx?fid=0d4d184b-9ca3-41e2-afb1-a6d62be20268" style="border: 2px solid #ccc; overflow-x:hidden !important; overflow:hidden;" width="100%"></iframe> In Phytelligence, Inc. v. Washington State University , the Federal Circuit held that the agreement terms at issue constituted “an unenforceable agreement to agree” that did not convey the license rights at issue. While decided under state law, this decision highlights the potential unenforceability of options clauses that do not specify sufficient terms of the option that may be exercised. The Agreement At Issue The agreement at issue was a “Propagation Agreement” that gave Phytelligence the right to propagate “WA 38” apple trees, which the Federal Circuit opinion describes as “a new apple cultivar that WSU developed and patented.” The dispute focused on Section 4 of the agreement, and whether it gave Phytelligence the right to sell WA 38 trees, or whether it was a mere agreement to agree to a future license to do so. The Federal Circuit opinion paraphrases Section 4 as follows: If [Phytelligence] is an authorized provider in good standing … by signing this Agreement, [Phytelligence] is hereby granted an option to participate as a provider and/or seller of Plant Materials listed in Exhibit A, if the Cultivar is officially released by WSU and becomes available for licensing by [WSU] …. [Phytelligence] will need to sign a separate contract with [WSU], or an agent of [WSU], to exercise this option. The District Court Decision The litigation before the court arose after WSU terminated the Propagation Agreement on the basis that “Phytelligence materially breached section 1.b of the Propagation Agreement when it sold and delivered WA 38 to a third-party without a license to do so.” In response, Phytelligence sued WSU in Washington state court alleging WSU breached Section 4 by granting another entity an exclusive license to manage commercialization of WA 38. After WSU asserted patent and trademark infringement counterclaims the action was removed to federal district court. The district court granted WSU’s motion for summary judgment, agreeing that Section 4 was an unenforceable “agreement to agree”. The Federal Circuit Decision The Federal Circuit decision was authored by Judge Reyna and joined by Chief Judge Prost and Jude Stoll. As noted in the Federal Circuit decision, the parties agreed that the contract interpretation issues were governed by Washington state law. The court explained that “Washington courts follow the ‘objective manifestation theory’ of contract interpretation, which requires a court to look to the reasonable meaning of the contract language to determine the parties’ intent.” Important to the dispute at hand, under Washington state law, “[a]n agreement to agree is an agreement to do something which requires a further meeting of the minds of the parties and without which it would not be complete. Agreements to agree are unenforceable in Washington.” Applying these principles, and analogizing to Washington state court decisions, the Federal Circuit came to the same conclusion as the district court: Here, Section 4 of the Propagation Agreement provides that Phytelligence is “hereby granted an option,” but that Phytelligence “will need to sign a separate contract with [WSU], or an agent of [WSU], to exercise this option.” …. Thus, the plain terms of the agreement provide that Phytelligence’s option turns on a future contract between the parties, and thus “a further meeting of the minds of the parties” is required before Phytelligence can commercialize WA 38. …. This renders Section 4 an unenforceable agreement to agree. Phytelligence also argued that extrinsic evidence supported its position, under several different theories. Without clearly concluding that extrinsic evidence could be relied upon under these circumstances, the Federal Circuit reviewed the evidence cited by Phytelligence and concluded it did not support a finding that Section 4 created an enforceable contractual obligation for WSU to grant Phytelligence a license to sell WA 38 apples.

Phytelligence Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

  • When was Phytelligence founded?

    Phytelligence was founded in 2012.

  • Where is Phytelligence's headquarters?

    Phytelligence's headquarters is located at 221 1st Ave. W, Seattle.

  • What is Phytelligence's latest funding round?

    Phytelligence's latest funding round is Dead.

  • How much did Phytelligence raise?

    Phytelligence raised a total of $20.01M.

  • Who are the investors of Phytelligence?

    Investors of Phytelligence include WRF Capital, Rio Investment Partners and Cowles Company.

  • Who are Phytelligence's competitors?

    Competitors of Phytelligence include Indigo Ag.

Loading...

Compare Phytelligence to Competitors

Farmers Business Network Logo
Farmers Business Network

Farmers Business Network is an agriculture focused company that develops a commerce platform and farmer-to-farmer network that helps its members make decisions to ensure the economic viability of their farms. It provides a range of services including data-backed insights, direct-to-farm commerce, and a sustainability platform. Its farmer-to-farmer agronomic information network helps farmers in the management of their data and gain insights from each other. The company was founded in 2014 and is based in San Carlos, California.

K
Kateri

Kateri provides custom regenerative ranching programs and services intended to help unlock the land's potential. It finds data-driven metrics to quantify regenerative ranching and soil carbon flows and improves infrastructure and technology to increase land's potential. It enables ranchers and farmers to secure new income streams through carbon credits and other nature-based programs. The company was founded in 2023 and is based in San Francisco, California.

Agcor Logo
Agcor

Agcor uses data science and machine learning to provide insight into water data and provide advanced water risk management and mitigation tools for the agricultural economy. It was formerly known as Aquaoso. The company was founded in 2017 and is based in Folsom, California.

R
Regrow

Regrow is a company focused on sustainable agriculture and climate change mitigation. The company offers a technology platform that provides insights for sustainability strategy, measures and verifies the impact of sustainable interventions, and monitors crops. It primarily serves the food brands, project developers, and growers in the agriculture industry. Regrow was formerly known as Dagan. It was founded in 2016 and is based in Durham, New Hampshire.

Arva Intelligence Logo
Arva Intelligence

Arva Intelligence is an agricultural intelligence platform for sustainable agriculture. It provides technology to farmers and agriculture service partners to lead economic and environmental stewardship in managed ecosystems. It was founded in 2018 and is based in Houston, Texas.

ZOWASEL Logo
ZOWASEL

ZOWASEL is an agricultural technology company focused on enhancing productivity, sustainability, and profitability within the agricultural sector. The company offers a digital marketplace that facilitates trade protection and integration across agricultural value chains, leveraging data science for optimization. ZOWASEL primarily serves stakeholders in the agricultural ecosystem, including farmers, cooperatives, crop buyers, crop sellers, financial institutions, and development partners. It was founded in 2017 and is based in Ikeja, Nigeria.

Loading...

CBI websites generally use certain cookies to enable better interactions with our sites and services. Use of these cookies, which may be stored on your device, permits us to improve and customize your experience. You can read more about your cookie choices at our privacy policy here. By continuing to use this site you are consenting to these choices.