Ellen Pao: Meritocracy in tech is a myth
The “biggest myth” about working in the tech industry is that it’s based on a meritocracy. So says Ellen Pao, the former Reddit CEO and venture capitalist, who is urging companies to take another look at how inclusive their workplaces really are as communities around the world grapple with a rise in anti-Asian hate. Pao, who now leads the nonprofit Project Include, reflected on her decades-long career in a recent interview with CNN Business, saying that she learned a lot of “painful” lessons along the way and didn’t always feel respected as an Asian American woman, even in her stint as chief of one of the world’s top social networks. “I think the biggest myth about tech and also the way I was raised, and a lot of Asians are raised, is that the workplace is a meritocracy. And if you work hard and you don’t complain and you do a good job, that you’ll be rewarded and that you will be treated fairly,” Pao said. “[But] actually, you learn at a certain point that that’s actually not the case. And for many people, it’s never the case.”
Unease in the workplace
Pao, a Chinese-American tech investor, fought a landmark gender discrimination lawsuit against her former employer, venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield and Byers, in 2015. Although she ultimately lost in court , the case rocked Silicon Valley and was widely credited with casting a light on long-running issues of sexism in the tech industry. But according to Pao, the obstacles didn’t end there. Even during her short time at Reddit — where Pao served as interim CEO from 2014 to 2015 — she said she didn’t always feel welcome on the job. Asked for specifics, she recalled being excluded from board discussions and said she had a colleague refuse to report to her. She also said she later swapped stories with other Asian CEOs, who felt “pushed out” of board activities. “There are definitely times when I did not feel included, where I wasn’t part of board interactions, where there were conversations that went on that I wasn’t part of, even as CEO,” she said. “There were definitely some people that I felt were uncomfortable working for me, not because of my accomplishments, but perhaps because I was Asian … or because I’m a woman.”
Some of the board discussions “happened toward the end of my time at Reddit,” she added. Pao stepped down after controversy erupted over the firing of a popular Reddit employee who had served as a liaison between the site and its moderators. After the incident, many angry users took to the internet — and Reddit itself — to demand Pao’s departure. An online petition calling for her resignation also picked up over 200,000 signatures at the time. “At the end, I was asked to resign,” said Pao. “So I imagine those were the conversations that were happening. But, you know, there are people that I was working with day to day where I would have assumed that they would have let me know, and given me a heads-up that these conversations were happening.”
The former chief executive also said that “there was somebody who would not report to me — insisting on reporting to the board — and that, as CEO, that didn’t feel great.”
“There were so many examples, it’s hard to list all of them,” she said. “It’s hard to know what part of it is race-based and what part of it is gender-based.”
Sam Altman, the board member at Reddit who announced Pao’s departure in 2015, said at the time that the company was “thankful for Ellen’s many contributions to Reddit and the technology industry generally.” Altman also told CNN at the time that Pao “did an incredible job,” despite stepping “into a really messy situation.”
Reddit did not respond to a request for additional comment on Monday. Both Pao and Altman, though, have acknowledged the vitriol directed toward Pao on Reddit, an influential forum for free speech and expression that also developed a darker reputation for enabling what many saw as a hotbed of misogyny and racism. Pao described some of the backlash toward her at the time as graphic threats, “racist memes” and “Photoshopped images,” which took aim at her ethnicity or gender. Altman alluded to those posts after her resignation, writing: “It was sickening to see some of the things redditors wrote about Ellen.”
“Disagreements are fine. Death threats are not,” he wrote . “People are still people even if there is internet between you.”
According to Pao, her story is not uncommon. She cited a recent anecdote from a friend, an Asian CEO of a successful startup, who “definitely felt some of the same things I felt — being excluded from really being part of the board … even though he had participated in this success and growth.”
“It’s a story that you hear from multiple Asian CEOs and it’s one that’s not great,” she said. A worsening problem
Such experiences are at least one reason why the recent spate of attacks on Asians aren’t a total surprise, according to Pao. Data shows the problem of discrimination is worsening, too. According to research from Project Include, Pao’s advocacy group that focuses on diversity in tech, 27% of Asian Americans or Asians across dozens of industries have experienced more racial hostility at work since the start of the coronavirus pandemic. “There’s a part of me where logically it’s just the extension of the experiences I’ve had in the past,” said Pao. “[But] I’m convinced that change is going to happen, because when I look at Gen Z and millennial workers, they are looking for something very different,” she said. “What [also] gives me hope and encouragement is seeing Asians and Asian Americans speak up for other communities.”
As workers at major companies like Google continue to mobilize and speak up, businesses also have the responsibility to reflect on the current tensions and improve situations for workers, said Pao. “I know from personal experience there are so many pressures that are pushing you to keep it quiet, to not rock the boat, to swallow your bitterness, to chi ku in the Asian culture,” she said, referring to the popular Chinese saying that urges one to not complain about personal struggles. “To see so many people speaking up at great personal cost, at professional cost, to lose a well-paying, stable job, because they see inequities and because they want to change the industry is very inspiring. It gives me hope that people will force change and that these companies can’t continue the way they have been without changing.”

Ellen Pao: Meritocracy in tech is a myth

The “biggest myth” about working in the tech industry is that it’s based on a meritocracy. So says Ellen Pao, the former Reddit CEO and venture capitalist, who is urging companies to take another look at how inclusive their workplaces really are as communities around the world grapple with a rise in anti-Asian hate. Pao, who now leads the nonprofit Project Include , reflected on her decades-long career in a recent interview with CNN Business, saying that she learned a lot of “painful” lessons along the way and didn’t always feel respected as an Asian American woman, even in her stint as chief of one of the world’s top social networks. “I think the biggest myth about tech and also the way I was raised, and a lot of Asians are raised, is that the workplace is a meritocracy. And if you work hard and you don’t complain and you do a good job, that you’ll be rewarded and that you will be treated fairly,” Pao said. “[But] actually, you learn at a certain point that that’s actually not the case. And for many people, it’s never the case.”
Unease in the workplace
Pao, a Chinese-American tech investor, fought a landmark gender discrimination lawsuit against her former employer, venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield and Byers, in 2015. Although she ultimately lost in court , the case rocked Silicon Valley and was widely credited with casting a light on long-running issues of sexism in the tech industry. But according to Pao, the obstacles didn’t end there. Even during her short time at Reddit — where Pao served as interim CEO from 2014 to 2015 — she said she didn’t always feel welcome on the job. Asked for specifics, she recalled being excluded from board discussions and said she had a colleague refuse to report to her. She also said she later swapped stories with other Asian CEOs, who felt “pushed out” of board activities. “There are definitely times when I did not feel included, where I wasn’t part of board interactions, where there were conversations that went on that I wasn’t part of, even as CEO,” she said. “There were definitely some people that I felt were uncomfortable working for me, not because of my accomplishments, but perhaps because I was Asian … or because I’m a woman.”
Some of the board discussions “happened toward the end of my time at Reddit,” she added. Pao stepped down after controversy erupted over the firing of a popular Reddit employee who had served as a liaison between the site and its moderators. After the incident, many angry users took to the internet — and Reddit itself — to demand Pao’s departure. An online petition calling for her resignation also picked up over 200,000 signatures at the time. “At the end, I was asked to resign,” said Pao. “So I imagine those were the conversations that were happening. But, you know, there are people that I was working with day to day where I would have assumed that they would have let me know, and given me a heads-up that these conversations were happening.”
The former chief executive also said that “there was somebody who would not report to me — insisting on reporting to the board — and that, as CEO, that didn’t feel great.”
“There were so many examples, it’s hard to list all of them,” she said. “It’s hard to know what part of it is race-based and what part of it is gender-based.”
Sam Altman, the board member at Reddit who announced Pao’s departure in 2015, said at the time that the company was “thankful for Ellen’s many contributions to Reddit and the technology industry generally.” Altman also told CNN at the time that Pao “did an incredible job,” despite stepping “into a really messy situation.”
Reddit did not respond to a request for additional comment on Monday. Both Pao and Altman, though, have acknowledged the vitriol directed toward Pao on Reddit, an influential forum for free speech and expression that also developed a darker reputation for enabling what many saw as a hotbed of misogyny and racism. Pao described some of the backlash toward her at the time as graphic threats, “racist memes” and “Photoshopped images,” which took aim at her ethnicity or gender. Altman alluded to those posts after her resignation, writing: “It was sickening to see some of the things redditors wrote about Ellen.”
“Disagreements are fine. Death threats are not,” he wrote . “People are still people even if there is internet between you.”
According to Pao, her story is not uncommon. She cited a recent anecdote from a friend, an Asian CEO of a successful startup, who “definitely felt some of the same things I felt — being excluded from really being part of the board … even though he had participated in this success and growth.”
“It’s a story that you hear from multiple Asian CEOs and it’s one that’s not great,” she said. A worsening problem
Such experiences are at least one reason why the recent spate of attacks on Asians aren’t a total surprise, according to Pao. Data shows the problem of discrimination is worsening, too. According to research from Project Include, Pao’s advocacy group that focuses on diversity in tech, 27% of Asian Americans or Asians across dozens of industries have experienced more racial hostility at work since the start of the coronavirus pandemic. “There’s a part of me where logically it’s just the extension of the experiences I’ve had in the past,” said Pao. “[But] I’m convinced that change is going to happen, because when I look at Gen Z and millennial workers, they are looking for something very different,” she said. “What [also] gives me hope and encouragement is seeing Asians and Asian Americans speak up for other communities.”
As workers at major companies like Google continue to mobilize and speak up, businesses also have the responsibility to reflect on the current tensions and improve situations for workers, said Pao. Related Articles

Ellen Pao: Meritocracy in the tech industry is a myth

PUBLISHED:
| UPDATED:
By Michelle Toh | CNN Business
The “biggest myth” about working in the tech industry is that it’s based on a meritocracy. So says Ellen Pao, the former Reddit CEO and venture capitalist, who is urging companies to take another look at how inclusive their workplaces really are as communities around the world grapple with a rise in anti-Asian hate. Pao, who now leads the nonprofit Project Include , reflected on her decades-long career in a recent interview with CNN Business, saying that she learned a lot of “painful” lessons along the way and didn’t always feel respected as an Asian American woman, even in her stint as chief of one of the world’s top social networks. “I think the biggest myth about tech and also the way I was raised, and a lot of Asians are raised, is that the workplace is a meritocracy. And if you work hard and you don’t complain and you do a good job, that you’ll be rewarded and that you will be treated fairly,” Pao said. “[But] actually, you learn at a certain point that that’s actually not the case. And for many people, it’s never the case.”
[vemba-video id=”business/2021/04/20/ellen-pao-intv-anti-asian-hate-gr-orig.cnn”]
Unease in the workplace
Pao, a Chinese-American tech investor, fought a landmark gender discrimination lawsuit against her former employer, venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield and Byers, in 2015. Although she ultimately lost in court , the case rocked Silicon Valley and was widely credited with casting a light on long-running issues of sexism in the tech industry. But according to Pao, the obstacles didn’t end there. Even during her short time at Reddit — where Pao served as interim CEO from 2014 to 2015 — she said she didn’t always feel welcome on the job. Asked for specifics, she recalled being excluded from board discussions and said she had a colleague refuse to report to her. She also said she later swapped stories with other Asian CEOs, who felt “pushed out” of board activities. “There are definitely times when I did not feel included, where I wasn’t part of board interactions, where there were conversations that went on that I wasn’t part of, even as CEO,” she said. “There were definitely some people that I felt were uncomfortable working for me, not because of my accomplishments, but perhaps because I was Asian … or because I’m a woman.”
Some of the board discussions “happened toward the end of my time at Reddit,” she added. Pao stepped down after controversy erupted over the firing of a popular Reddit employee who had served as a liaison between the site and its moderators. After the incident, many angry users took to the internet — and Reddit itself — to demand Pao’s departure. An online petition calling for her resignation also picked up over 200,000 signatures at the time. “At the end, I was asked to resign,” said Pao. “So I imagine those were the conversations that were happening. But, you know, there are people that I was working with day to day where I would have assumed that they would have let me know, and given me a heads-up that these conversations were happening.”
The former chief executive also said that “there was somebody who would not report to me — insisting on reporting to the board — and that, as CEO, that didn’t feel great.”
“There were so many examples, it’s hard to list all of them,” she said. “It’s hard to know what part of it is race-based and what part of it is gender-based.”
Sam Altman, the board member at Reddit who announced Pao’s departure in 2015, said at the time that the company was “thankful for Ellen’s many contributions to Reddit and the technology industry generally.” Altman also told CNN at the time that Pao “did an incredible job,” despite stepping “into a really messy situation.”
Reddit did not respond to a request for additional comment on Monday. Both Pao and Altman, though, have acknowledged the vitriol directed toward Pao on Reddit, an influential forum for free speech and expression that also developed a darker reputation for enabling what many saw as a hotbed of misogyny and racism. Pao described some of the backlash toward her at the time as graphic threats, “racist memes” and “Photoshopped images,” which took aim at her ethnicity or gender. Altman alluded to those posts after her resignation, writing: “It was sickening to see some of the things redditors wrote about Ellen.”
“Disagreements are fine. Death threats are not,” he wrote . “People are still people even if there is internet between you.”
According to Pao, her story is not uncommon. She cited a recent anecdote from a friend, an Asian CEO of a successful startup, who “definitely felt some of the same things I felt — being excluded from really being part of the board … even though he had participated in this success and growth.”
“It’s a story that you hear from multiple Asian CEOs and it’s one that’s not great,” she said. A worsening problem
Such experiences are at least one reason why the recent spate of attacks on Asians aren’t a total surprise, according to Pao. Data shows the problem of discrimination is worsening, too. According to research from Project Include, Pao’s advocacy group that focuses on diversity in tech, 27% of Asian Americans or Asians across dozens of industries have experienced more racial hostility at work since the start of the coronavirus pandemic. “There’s a part of me where logically it’s just the extension of the experiences I’ve had in the past,” said Pao. “[But] I’m convinced that change is going to happen, because when I look at Gen Z and millennial workers, they are looking for something very different,” she said. “What [also] gives me hope and encouragement is seeing Asians and Asian Americans speak up for other communities.”
As workers at major companies like Google continue to mobilize and speak up, businesses also have the responsibility to reflect on the current tensions and improve situations for workers, said Pao. Related Articles

The leading employment agency listed on the Borsa Italiana MTA acquired the Italian digital recruiting platform, to integrate technology in their search & selection business. Mind the Bridge advisory firm behind the due diligence and the deal. Milan, Brussels June 5th, 2018 – “Exits are key for the sustainability and growth of the European startup ecosystems. Acquiring corporates get access to innovation and talent, startups get scale and access to distribution channels, investors get their money back and invest in the next generation of technologies. Everybody is winning.”, Alberto Onetti, President of Mind the Bridge , commented on the acquisition of Meritocracy by Openjobmetis , announced today. The leading employment agency listed at the Borsa Italiana MTA acquired 100% of Coverclip S.r.l., the company behind Meritocracy, the digital recruiting platform based in Milan, with the goal of embedding and developing technology in the current search & selection business of the Group. The deal is the result of a collaboration initiated 2-years ago with Mind the Bridge, a global organization providing innovation advisory for corporates and startups. Mind the Bridge helped Openjobmetis to structure the newborn “Open Innovation” unit, announced at the Star Conference in Borsa Italiana last March with a goal of nurturing innovation inside Openjobmetis and finding new strategic opportunities with startups. Rosario Rasizza, Openjobmetis CEO, said “The acquisition of Meritocracy is part of our strategic growth in the digital transformation, started with the creation of our Open Innovation, thanks to our partner Mind the Bridge, and continued with the launch of Shakejob and the acquisition of Badaplus app. Meritocracy certainly represents an important opportunity for the growth of our present and future business, since it will allow us to further specialize in the selection process. We registered a growing demand for qualified personnel in the digital professions and we want to be ready to manage this transition, a goal which will be helped by this acquisition. But we also want to look further with the support of Mind the Bridge, to continue identifying new vectors of innovation and diversification.”
“We are very proud of this result – ended Alberto Onetti – We scouted Meritocracy in 2016 for Openjobmetis during our first Innovation Boot Camp and we have followed up on the interaction since then, supporting the due diligence and the negotiation. This acquisition is not only beneficial for both the companies but also for the whole Italian ecosystem, which needs more exits than ever before.”
Riccardo Galli, Meritocracy co-founder, said “We founded Meritocracy to build the place where young digital professionals can find the jobs of tomorrow. Looking for your next job should be a rewarding experience. We figured out a candidate-centric process, which enables users to have an in-depth exploration of Companies’ vision and working life and uses technology to match with the right job opportunity. Thanks to our team and the support of our partners like United Ventures, Rancilio Cube and several private investors from the digital ecosystem, 10.000+ candidates found a new job through Meritocracy. The acquisition by Openjobmetis is a starting point: we will develop EU market and foster R&D, supported by a Group that proved to be a leading voice on the Italian Market, willing to disrupt traditional business models in the HR sector.”
# # #
Note
Openjobmetis was assisted by K Finance (Clairfield Italy – Filippo Guicciardi and Paola Quadri) as advisor, by Avvocati di Impresa (Alberto Calvi di Coenzo and Rosanna Frischetto) for the legal part and by Engineering Ingegneria Informatica SpA and Studio Luisetti & Sterchele e C. Srl for the due diligence. Meritocracy was assisted by Portolano Cavallo (Antonia Verna e Daniel Joseph Giuliano) as legal advisor. Disclaimer
Certain statements in this press release could constitute forecasts. These statements concern risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ, even substantially, from those anticipated. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the ability to manage the effects of macroeconomic developments, to acquire new assets and to effectively integrate them, the ability to acquire new contracts, the ability to manage effective relationships with customers, the ability to achieve and manage growth, currency fluctuations, changes in local conditions, information system problems, inventory risks, credit and insurance risks, changes in tax systems, as well as other political factors, economic and technological risks and other risks and uncertainties.

Startup exit in HR Tech: Openjobmetis acquires Meritocracy

The Case Against Meritocracy
Image
Cottages in the Camp Meeting Association neighborhood of Oak Bluffs, Mass., on the island of Martha’s Vineyard.CreditCreditSteven Senne/Associated Press
This week I briefly trended on Twitter — a bracing experience for any columnist, because it means that you’ve done your job of provocation a little bit too well. In my particular case the provocation was a column about the phenomenon of George H.W. Bush nostalgia, which I suggested reflected a general nostalgia for some of the aristocratic virtues of the old WASP establishment, and a disappointment with the meritocracy that has risen in its place. This argument was read by certain readers (and a few social media non-readers) as a paean to white privilege, even a brief for white supremacy. In these misreadings, there was an assumption that to praise, in any way, the elite that predated the modern meritocracy is to reject racial diversity, minority and female advancement, in favor of permanent white rule. That’s not my view. Rather I think ideals of diversity and meritocracy are two different ways of shaping an elite, which can advance together but which are just as often separable, or even in tension with each other. And I would separate them. I think it was a good and necessary thing that the American upper class diversified, and that more African-Americans and Jews and Catholics (like myself) and women now share privileges and powers once reserved for Protestant white men. But I think that same upper class was unwise to abandon an aristocratic self-conception in favor of a meritocratic one. On the evidence we have, the meritocratic ideal ends up being just as undemocratic as the old emphasis on inheritance and tradition, and it forges an elite that has an aristocracy’s vices (privilege, insularity, arrogance) without the sense of duty, self-restraint and noblesse oblige that WASPs at their best displayed. Here it’s important to stress that a WASP was not just any white Protestant or upper-crust American of the pre-1960s past. The term properly refers to a specific kind of American elite, mostly from the Northeast, mostly high-church Protestants, concentrated in a few cities (Boston, Philadelphia, New York, plus some Midwestern and Californian outposts), generally associated with the Republican Party (with occasional defectors like F.D.R. ), who dominated a particular set of fields (academia, finance, foreign policy) and shared the code of service and piety and manners that defined the elder Bush’s career. The WASPs were distinct from other white elites — including the planter class that ruled the South, the regional elites that emerged as the frontier moved westward, the immigrant tycoons who challenged WASP power in the East. Their importance rested, to borrow from a WASP acquaintance’s email this week, on being “primus inter pares” — first among equals, with a particular kind of power in a particular set of institutions, and an ability to set a tone for the American upper class that was adopted by other groups when they ascended. And ascend they often did, because the older American system was both hierarchical and permeable, with room for actual merit even without a meritocratic organizing theory. Those advancing groups included non-Anglo-Saxons, and eventually non-Protestants and non-whites. In the middle of the 20th century, you could find elite Catholics who imitated WASPishness — think of William F. Buckley Jr. or the Kennedys. You could even find WASPish African-Americans: The oldest summer colony for black Americans, and not coincidentally a place where the somewhat WASPy Barack Obama liked to hang out in the summer, sits on the shores of the WASP isle of Martha’s Vineyard. These imitations existed in the shadow of racial apartheid and residual anti-Catholicism. But their example suggested that an aristocratic spirit was transferable to a more diverse elite, that there could be Catholic and African-American and Jewish aristocrats — like, say, the family that has long stewarded this newspaper — who could adopt the WASP establishment’s upper-class virtues without the ethnic and religious chauvinism. But then the WASPs themselves decided to dissolve their own aristocracy, and transform their once-Protestant universities into a secular mass-opportunity system — a more democratic way of education, in which anyone with enough talent could climb the ladder, and personal achievement and technical expertise would be prized above all else. This was meritocracy, the system that we now take for granted. And for several reasons it didn’t work as planned. First, meritocracy segregates talent rather than dispersing it. By plucking the highest achievers from all over the country and encouraging them to cluster together in the same few cities, it robs localities of their potential leaders — so that instead of an Eastern establishment negotiating with overlapping groups of regional elites (or with working-class or ethnic leaders), you have a mass upper class segregated from demoralized peripheries. Second, the meritocratic elite inevitably tends back toward aristocracy, because any definition of “merit” you choose will be easier for the children of these self-segregated meritocrats to achieve. But even as it restratifies society, the meritocratic order also insists that everything its high-achievers have is justly earned. “He was born on third base and thought he hit a triple,” Ann Richards famously quipped of George H.W. Bush; well, the typical meritocrat is born on third base, hustles home, and gets praised as if he just hit a grand slam. This spirit discourages inherited responsibility and cultural stewardship; it brushes away the disciplines of duty; it makes the past seem irrelevant, because everyone is supposed to come from the same nowhere and rule based on technique alone. As a consequence, meritocrats are often educated to be bad leaders, and bad people, in a very specific way — a way of arrogant intelligence unmoored from historical experience, ambition untempered by self-sacrifice. The way of the “best and the brightest” at the dawn of the technocratic era and the “smartest guys in the room” decades later, the way of the arsonists of late-2000s Wall Street and the “move fast and break things” culture of Silicon Valley. Or even to some extent the way of Donald Trump, who is white and technically a Protestant but not, not any kind of WASP, combining instead the worst of meritocratic self-deception (the rich kid with a Wharton degree posturing as a self-made man) and the worst of the populist reaction that it summons up. Diversity, despite what many liberals want to think, does not provide a solution to this problem. A diverse elite may be good in its own right, as a matter of justice and representation. But nothing about being a woman or a minority makes you immune to meritocracy’s ruthless solipsism. Just ask Elizabeth Holmes or the slipping-from-grace Sheryl Sandberg, exceptions to the Silicon Valley boys’ club whose trajectories prove the meritocratic rule. Which is why it’s worth looking backward and forward at the same time as we contemplate what’s wrong with our elite. I don’t want to bring back the WASPs; if I had the magic wand to conjure a different elite, it would be a multiracial, multilingual Catholic aristocracy ruling from Quebec to Chile. (Hey, you asked.) But I do want to raise the possibility that an aristocracy that knows itself to be one might be more clearsighted and effective than an aristocracy that doesn’t, and that the WASPs had at least one clear advantage over their presently-floundering successors: They knew who and what they were.

The Case Against Meritocracy

The HR tech collection includes software vendors that enable companies to develop, hire, manage, and pay their workforces. Focus areas include benefits, compensation, engagement, EORs & PEOs, HRIS & HRMS, learning & development, payroll, talent acquisition, and talent management.

HR Tech

Acquired

Meritocracy provides a SaaS-based platform that allows employers to select and recruit talent. The company's proprietary technology allows companies to select candidates based on their needs and preferences, automating and decreasing the cost the recruiting process. In particular, the platform enables HR teams to assess the set of experiences of job seekers and to increase the value of their skills, interests and aspirations matching the company's needs.

Name	Title	Status
Riccardo Galli	Founder	Current
Subscribe to see more	Subscribe to see more	Subscribe to see more
Subscribe to see more	Subscribe to see more	Subscribe to see more
Subscribe to see more	Subscribe to see more	Subscribe to see more

Name	Riccardo Galli	Subscribe to see more	Subscribe to see more	Subscribe to see more
Work History
Title	Founder	Subscribe to see more	Subscribe to see more	Subscribe to see more
Status	Current	Subscribe to see more	Subscribe to see more	Subscribe to see more

Wells Fargo Success Story

Professional Services

Platform Overview

Meritocracy

Executives

Meritocracy Management Team

4 Team Members