Kyruus delivers enterprise provider search and scheduling solutions to help health systems match patients. It provides data management, patient online scheduling, digital patient intake, data and schedulling integration, and more. It helps to search for and facilitate appointments with clinically available physicians. The company was founded in 2010 and is based in Boston, Massachusetts.
ESPs containing Kyruus
The ESP matrix leverages data and analyst insight to identify and rank leading companies in a given technology landscape.
The white-label patient intake platforms market provides healthcare providers with customizable, branded solutions for managing patient intake and onboarding processes. These platforms enable patients to complete forms and provide medical information electronically, improving the accuracy and efficiency of data collection. White-label patient intake platforms also help reduce the administrative bu…
Kyruus's Products & Differentiators
Provider data management platform
Research containing Kyruus
Get data-driven expert analysis from the CB Insights Intelligence Unit.
CB Insights Intelligence Analysts have mentioned Kyruus in 3 CB Insights research briefs, most recently on Sep 22, 2023.
Expert Collections containing Kyruus
Expert Collections are analyst-curated lists that highlight the companies you need to know in the most important technology spaces.
Kyruus is included in 3 Expert Collections, including Conference Exhibitors.
HLTH is a healthcare event bringing together startups and large companies from pharma, health insurance, business intelligence, and more to discuss the shifting landscape of healthcare
Digital Health 150
The most promising digital health startups transforming the healthcare industry
The digital health collection includes vendors developing software, platforms, sensor & robotic hardware, health data infrastructure, and tech-enabled services in healthcare. The list excludes pureplay pharma/biopharma, sequencing instruments, gene editing, and assistive tech.
Kyruus has filed 10 patents.
Network protocols, Wireless networking, Network topology, Computer network security, Channel access methods
Network protocols, Wireless networking, Network topology, Computer network security, Channel access methods
Latest Kyruus News
Sep 1, 2023
Yoo, who leads health tech investment at venture-capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, outlined her fintech investment thesis and why the healthcare industry is at an inflection point for adoption. Published Aug. 31, 2023 First published on Julie Yoo is a staunch advocate for companies at the intersection of healthcare and finance. And as a general partner and leader of health tech investment at Andreessen Horowitz, she’s well-situated to fuel companies looking to ameliorate payment problems in healthcare. Yoo joined Andreessen Horowitz, otherwise known as a16z, in 2019 after co-founding patient access startup Kyruus — an experience Yoo says gave her a front seat to the financial challenges faced by both healthcare companies and patients. Andreessen Horowitz — the biggest venture-capital firm by assets under management — has been an active digital health investor after the COVID-19 pandemic spurred record fundraising in the sector, according to Pitchbook data. The VC recently inked a broad thesis outlining where it sees attractive investment opportunities in the healthcare fintech landscape. Yoo shared that investment thesis in a wide-ranging interview with Industry Dive that also touched on her advice for founders going up against entrenched behemoths and why the industry is at a tipping point for fintech adoption. Editor’s note: This interview has been edited for clarity and brevity. HEALTHCARE DIVE: Why is fintech in healthcare such an area of interest for you? JULIE YOO: While at Kyruus, I got fascinated about the financial flow of payments, which drives all the things that work and, more importantly and more frequently, the things that don’t work in our system. In addition, if you think of insurance as fintech, those are clearly the biggest companies in the space. We’ve done a lot of work to understand and unbundle those business models. What are the components of giants like UnitedHealth Group? How do they tick? Where are opportunities for startups to compete head-to-head to provide a 10 times better experience or 10 times better competency? And where are the white spaces where UnitedHealth doesn’t have a good footprint that startups can go after? We’ve made a number of investments based on that thesis. What are the biggest opportunities you’ve identified for fintech startups in healthcare? YOO: The simplest is administrative bloat. The majority of waste in our industry is administrative overhead of unnecessary or redundant tasks that are done through inefficient human labor that can absolutely be automated. We have a number of companies in our portfolio that represent that thesis, of how do you use cutting-edge technologies to do some of the simplest tasks across the revenue cycle. We have companies doing that on the reimbursed revenue side, like Akasa, and companies doing that on the patient side, like Cedar. I show these products to my colleagues in our consumer and enterprise practices and they’re kind of like, what’s special about that? And I’m like, it’s special in healthcare. The second bucket is the actual payment model, and how we can create technology solutions that actually contemplate value-based payment models versus fee-for-service. We have a company in our portfolio called Pearl Health that provides software to provider groups to help them bear risk, creating a recurring revenue model that’s far more resilient for these practices. We’re getting a lot of interest from providers who want to stay independent. How do you advise your startups that are going head-to-head with larger companies to carve out market share? YOO: A lot of investors are averse to starting with a wedge. Some people look at the segment of the universe that’s attainable to Pearl today and say oh, that’s too small, it’s not worth our while. Pearl is going to that underserved long tail of practices that no one else cares about, including other risk-assumption companies like Optum or Agilon or Aledade — because they’re big and have growth targets, there’s just a certain floor of what they can go after. But we believe every niche in healthcare can be $10 billion over time. We are taking a bet that value-based, risk-bearing primary care is the future and the industry is going to continue to move in that direction. But if it does, then the seemingly small segment that Pearl is able to go after today will be 100 times what it was. Where else do you see opportunity besides value-based care? YOO: It’s all about finding the severely underserved pockets of the market. On the employer benefits side, direct purchasing from employers is to me a signal of where they aren’t being served by their health plan. All of the point solutions in these areas — employers aren’t getting what they need from their payers. From a fintech lens, we’ve invested in a couple of companies here, like Thatch. They’ve created a single card — you can swipe your medical expenses on that card, and they’ve built a software layer that allows for real-time adjudication of whether that expense is a covered benefit. And they have a marketplace of health plan products you can buy, too. Turquoise is another company that’s operating in the payer-provider interface. They’re digitizing payer-provider contracts, and becoming a system of record for that. They can forecast out — using price transparency data — how much a provider’s revenue would change if you were to negotiate this one term in a contract. That allows you to scenario plan. We’ve been very surprised by the upside on how many people are buying Turquoise’s data. Payers and providers are using it for competitive intelligence, because now they can see everyone in their markets and what they’ve contracted for. They also can use it to get their own house in order. We’ve also had some hedge funds reach out to us who wanted visibility into the publicly traded providers and payers to inform their market research. Are we at an inflection point for fintech adoption? YOO: I do think we’re at a tipping point. With value-based care, we’ve demonstrated scale, specifically in the primary care and Medicare Advantage world. The CVS-Oak Street acquisition was a nice crucible moment where people recognized now the big players are paying attention — this is a viable strategy. We believe that will be replicated in different forms across the commercial market. We have an investment called Firefly Health that’s a payvider focused entirely on value-based models for employer markets. We have a company called Waymark that’s doing this in Medicaid. On the employer side, companies will go bankrupt if they don’t figure out their healthcare benefits financing strategy. And on the administrative layer piece, hospitals are finally waking up and realizing they need to transform their operating model to survive. They’re losing staff left and right. That’s where we’re seeing a lot of movement on automation. Are there roadblocks? YOO: So many. Any time you’re selling to enterprises, there’s just general inertia, and conservatism of doing new things. It’s the paradox of, you’re bleeding money, and this solution can make you more money, but you have to make the investment to get the new solution in place. Then there’s the, we’re going to build it ourselves. So large companies like United — their bias is we’re going to do this ourselves. Why would we waste our time working with startups? But that can be a benefit. Their competitors, the underdogs, want any kind of competitive edge they can get. Digital health funding is waning. How would you characterize the current state of the market? YOO: I keep telling my founders, even in this downturn it is 10 times better today than it was in 2010. This is a very normal, healthy environment, frankly, where people care about your economics and efficiency. That’s how it was before the pandemic. We’re just so early. We’re in the 1999 of the internet era in digital health. We truly have not even gotten started with respect to these tech-oriented models. These companies just haven’t grown up yet. It’s still going to be another five to 10 years before we see the real scale of potential outcomes in this domain. For that to occur, we need more funding in growth stages. I think there’s a tremendous investment opportunity coming in the next couple of years.
Kyruus Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
When was Kyruus founded?
Kyruus was founded in 2010.
Where is Kyruus's headquarters?
Kyruus's headquarters is located at 100 Franklin Street, Boston.
What is Kyruus's latest funding round?
Kyruus's latest funding round is Series E.
How much did Kyruus raise?
Kyruus raised a total of $194.19M.
Who are the investors of Kyruus?
Investors of Kyruus include Providence Ventures, The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Venrock, Highland Capital Partners, Health Evolution Partners and 13 more.
Who are Kyruus's competitors?
Competitors of Kyruus include MD MatchUp, Referwell, Savana, AristaMD, Notable and 12 more.
What products does Kyruus offer?
Kyruus's products include KyruusOne and 3 more.
Compare Kyruus to Competitors
ReferralMD delivers referral management, provider search, and e-consult solutions that help hospitals, health systems, payers, and pharma match patients with the providers best suited to care for them. The SmartMATCH suite of solutions—for consumers, access centers, and referral networks—enables a consistent patient experience across multiple points of access, helping close the feedback loop with receiving and referring providers.
QGenda is a provider of automated healthcare workforce management software. The subscription-based automated scheduling software is used by practice groups, hospitals, academic medical centers, and enterprise health systems to build optimal schedules for clinicians and medical staff to provide the best possible care.
Intrigma provides tools such as physician scheduling, pay calculation and communications for medical professionals. The company's goal is to transform the healthcare industry by giving organizations the scheduling tools they need to increase provider satisfaction and productivity, which will translate to a higher quality of patient care.
Vim is a healthcare technology company. It helps payers and providers improve the quality of care, reduce costs, and improve the patient experience. It was formerly known as BookMD. It was founded in 2015 and is based in New York, New York.
eHealth Technologies utilizes technology to retrieve external medical records and images and securely deliver them electronically to healthcare providers. This technology is also utilized to provide automated access to all radiology and cardiology images, and now ECGs, generated within a community, region, or state and deliver them electronically to the users of health information exchanges (HIE).
OnShift delivers cloud-based human capital management software and proactive services to solve everyday workforce challenges in healthcare. The company's suite of products offers solutions in hiring, scheduling, and workforce analysis. OnShift serves post-acute care and senior living organizations. The company was founded in 2008 and is based in Cleveland, Ohio.