Search company, investor...
Jobster company logo

The profile is currenly unclaimed by the seller. All information is provided by CB Insights.


Acquired | Acquired

About Jobster

Jobster is a vertical search engine focusing on connecting employers with job seekers. Jobster collects jobs from all around the internet so users to do not have to search everywhere to find a job. Employers also have the ability to post jobs on Jobster.

Jobster Headquarters Location

Predict your next investment

The CB Insights tech market intelligence platform analyzes millions of data points on venture capital, startups, patents , partnerships and news mentions to help you see tomorrow's opportunities, today.

Expert Collections containing Jobster

Expert Collections are analyst-curated lists that highlight the companies you need to know in the most important technology spaces.

Jobster is included in 1 Expert Collection, including HR Tech.


HR Tech

4,016 items

HR tech startups are helping companies manage critical pain points in HR processes such as recruitment, automation, career development, compensation, and benefits management, through a mix of software and services.

Latest Jobster News

How one entrepreneur burned through $300m+

Jan 17, 2021

Jason Goldberg’s ecommerce firm,, was as soon as valued at $1B. Three years later, it was one of many greatest startup flops in historical past. This version of The Hustle was dropped at you by SimpliSafe … The most effective house safety within the frickin’ recreation. Sunday, January 17, 2021 The Hustle is proud to ship authentic longform journalism to your inbox each Sunday. This work wouldn’t be attainable with out the assist of our sponsor, SimpliSafe . Please assist them so we will proceed to deliver you essentially the most attention-grabbing tales you’ll discover wherever. How one of many world’s fastest-growing startups burned via $300m Jason Goldberg’s ecommerce firm,, was as soon as valued at $1B. Three years later, it was one of many greatest startup flops in historical past. Observe: This story was initially revealed on our weblog in 2017. It has been up to date to mirror latest modifications. On an overcast day in November 2014, Jason Goldberg sat at his desk in NYC, poring over the time period sheet to promote his firm, This second was meant to be the fruits of years of laborious work — numerous late nights spent strategizing, analyzing financials, and assembly with buyers. Fab had raised $336m since rebranding itself as an ecommerce platform in 2011. At one level, it had been a unicorn, valued at $1B. It had 750 staff on a number of continents, a schmaltzy HQ in New York, and an infinite warehouse stocked with tens of millions of merchandise. Now, the corporate was promoting for lower than one-tenth of its authentic valuation. As a serial entrepreneur, Goldberg had skilled ups and downs earlier than. However this was totally different. This was a screw-up of huge proportions. How had all of it gone so flawed? Fab’s rise and fall is a case research within the perils of over-funding. Nevertheless it’s additionally a narrative a couple of serial entrepreneur who has refused to surrender within the wake of failure. The ‘geeky child on the block’ Rising up in Rockville, Maryland, a DC suburb, Goldberg was at all times the “first child within the neighborhood to get the most recent laptop when it got here out.” He spent his early days programming on an Atari 400 together with his dad. Later, as an undergrad at Emory College, he was drawn to a distinct area of equipment: politics. In 1991, Goldberg took a hiatus from school to work on Invoice Clinton’s presidential marketing campaign. When Clinton received, Goldberg was employed as a particular assistant to the president’s chief of employees, Erskine Bowles. He was there when the web was first applied on the White Home in 1994 — and he witnessed, firsthand, the gold rush of alternatives it ushered in. On the top of the dot-com bubble in 1998, he packed his luggage for California, the place he concurrently earned an MBA at Stanford and developed digital methods for AOL Time Warner and T-Cell. Then, he determined to strike out on his personal. Jason Goldberg in 2016 (Fb) By 2002, Goldberg felt he had the requisite instruments to discovered his personal startup. After 2 years of planning, he and his shut pal, Phillip Bogle, moved to Seattle and launched Jobster, a B2B job referral website. “Reid Hoffman [of LinkedIn] and I had very comparable concepts on the similar time,” Goldberg advised The Hustle in 2017. “His strategy was to construct out a client community — a ‘who is aware of who is aware of who’ that might be monetized. We had been centered on the enterprise aspect.” At first, Jobster was an enormous hit. The corporate raised $52.5m from buyers and was cited as one among Seattle’s fastest-growing firms. In an unorthodox transfer for a younger startup, Goldberg used the brand new capital to purchase out a collection of different firms and started scaling the group at lightning velocity. However an enormous drawback belied the corporate’s veneer of success. “We had been so centered on progress that the product itself suffered,” Goldberg mentioned. “We had been good at promoting a imaginative and prescient, however we weren’t capable of ship on the merchandise we promised.” A screenshot of, circa 2008 (Wayback Machine) As Jobster struggled to determine its enterprise mannequin, Goldberg needed to lay off ~40% of the corporate and slash prices. In 2007, he stepped down as CEO. Ultimately, the corporate offered for “pennies on the greenback.” As soon as heralded as Seattle’s subsequent huge tech titan, Goldberg had grow to be town’s pariah-in-residence. “The blame was all mine,” he mentioned. “I actually realized that no quantity of selling or gross sales might make up for not getting the product proper.” On to the following one After Jobster, Goldberg discovered himself marooned in Seattle. “The town didn’t have a developed tradition that [it] was OK to fail,” he mentioned. “I used to be very vocal about failure, and it didn’t go over nicely there.” So, he took off for New York. Goldberg wasted little time getting again on the horse. In early 2008, he based Socialmedian — a personalised information filter that aggregated information tales from across the internet and arranged them into classes. This time, as a substitute of in search of an enormous infusion of capital, Goldberg relied on a comparatively small seed round of $560k. When Lehman Brothers collapsed, sparking a world monetary disaster, Goldberg anxiously referred to as 3 firms who’d beforehand provided to purchase him out and advised them the corporate was up on the market. The most effective provide got here from Germany-based social community Xing: $4m in money, and an earn-out valued at as much as $3.5m. Goldberg took the deal. Goldberg discovered higher luck in NYC than in Seattle (Pixabay) “Socialmedian was all the things Jobster wasn’t,” he says. “It was about conserving issues small and specializing in the product. And in the long run, it labored out for us.” As a part of the deal, Goldberg relocated to Germany and joined Xing as a VP. Ultimately, he was promoted to CTO and helped enhance the corporate’s share value from $30 to $70. He’d gotten his mojo again — or so it appeared. The massive fail By 2010, the serial entrepreneur was once more able to strike out on his personal. So, he teamed up with a designer named Bradford Shellhammer and launched Fabulis, a social community for homosexual males. Between January and December of that yr, the corporate raised $2m in funding from buyers. However a yr in, Goldberg realized the corporate wasn’t catching on like he thought it will. “My philosophy was that if you happen to can’t do one thing in a yr, it is best to simply throw it out and do one thing else,” he says. “You possibly can’t iterate your approach to a enterprise mannequin.” Over dinner, Goldberg and Shellhammer stepped again to reassess their route, asking themselves 3 questions: What are we most captivated with? It’s one thing we could be one of the best at? What’s an enormous untapped market we will add worth to? On a dinner serviette, the duo sketched out the one factor on the intersection of those 3 questions: design. The dinner serviette brainstorm that led to the creation of (recreation of picture through Goldberg) One week after that brainstorm, Goldberg shut down Fabulis, letting his buyers know he was doubling down on a brand new idea — a curated, design-focused ecommerce platform referred to as The thought was to curate eye-catching items from boutique designers and provide flash gross sales centered round day by day design inspirations. Beneath their mannequin, Goldberg and Shellhammer offered restricted quantities of stock at a reduction for one- or 2-day intervals, testing the waters for bigger bulk orders. They thrived on providing objects folks couldn’t discover wherever else —  all the things from throw pillows to a $1,775 martini glass chandelier. On June 9, 2011, the web site went reside. And in very brief order, its proof of idea was validated: The Hustle Fab reached 1m customers in simply 5 months — quicker than goliaths like Fb, Twitter, and Groupon. The corporate started to generate buzz as one of many “fastest-growing startups on the planet.” The gross sales rose in tandem with consumer progress: its first yr, Fab’s income elevated by 6x, from $18m to $112m. Buyers had been attracted like moths to a lantern. By the tip of 2012, Fab raised almost $170m and was valued at upwards of $500m: August 2011: $7.7m (led by Menlo Ventures) December 2011: $40m (led by Andreessen Horowitz) July 2012: $105m (led by Atomico) Nov 2012: $15m (led by VTB Capital) The corporate basked within the limelight. Goldberg traveled round Europe, the place he gave a presentation titled “From Zero to Hero in 9 Months.” He invested in a 2-story workplace house in NYC and an enormous stock warehouse in New Jersey. The group grew to greater than 750 staff. After which, all the things got here crashing down. Deadly errors Behind the scenes, Fab’s board members weren’t glad. The corporate was spending astronomical sums of cash on logistics, stock, and enlargement— some $14m monthly at its peak. Goldberg had additionally fallen shy of the corporate’s $140m annual gross sales objective for 2012. Bradford Shellhammer (left) and Jason Goldberg (proper) at an occasion in NYC in 2013 New York Metropolis (Stephen Lovekin/Getty Photographs) In early 2013, Goldberg was presented 2 choices by his board: Deal with the US market solely, and goal profitability round $150m in gross sales, or Push for 100% YoY progress and broaden quick globally The vote was unanimously in favor of possibility No. 2. That summer season, Fab raised a $165m Collection D, bulking up its complete investments to $330m+, and valuing the corporate at $900m+. And underneath strain from board members and advisors, Goldberg got down to quickly construct out the corporate’s worldwide presence. This resulted in a number of key errors: Spending $60m-$100m on 3 “clone” rivals and making a untimely push into the European market Increasing stock from 1k objects to 11k+ objects, and shedding the “curation edge” that made it particular “At first, hardly something on Fab was on Amazon,” Goldberg advised us in 2017. “By 2013, 80-90% of the merchandise we offered had been on Amazon — with decrease costs and free 2-day delivery.” “I bear in mind we had been all sitting round doing a preview of our merchandise, and my group was like, ‘This isn’t inspiring in any respect,’” he continued. “Our greatest-selling product was a T-shirt with a large image of an animal on it. Simply crappy stuff. And I assumed, ‘Is that this actually going to work out?’” By October of 2013, Fab had burned via $200m of its $336m in funding. In a letter to his group, Goldberg expressed main considerations. An excerpt from a letter circulated by Goldberg to Fab employees (Enterprise Insider) “Now we have a major problem,” he wrote. “We spent $200m prior to now 2 years… and we now have not confirmed out our enterprise mannequin. We’re essentially the most closely funded startup in NYC in our life cycle and we now have spent ⅔ of the money… Holy shit this can be a huge deal.” Within the letter, he expanded on a number of errors he’d made: I guided us to go too quick. I enabled us to lose our core focus. I didn’t insist on honing in on our goal buyer. I spent an excessive amount of on advertising and marketing earlier than we bought the patron worth proposition proper. An unlucky exit Goldberg’s co-founder, Shellhammer, a “quirky man, who set the fashion of the corporate,” finally grew sad and departed on mutual phrases. By December 2013, solely 150 of Fab’s 700 staff remained. “It was demise by 1,000 cuts,” says Goldberg. “It was lots of the similar issues from earlier than: We grew too quick, went worldwide too quick, constructed out of warehouses too quick.” The workplace in Berlin, Germany, in 2013 (Jens Kalaene through Getty Photographs) The following yr was centered on injury management. “There was some extent in 2014 the place we had a chart that confirmed we’d diminished the burn charge from $11m to $1m a month,” says Goldberg. “One of many board members turned to me and mentioned, ‘That is one of the best chart I’ve ever seen at this firm.’ That was powerful.” By June 2014, Goldberg had begun engaged on one other mission inside Fab — a brand new ecommerce firm referred to as Hem, which might deal with “authentic, high-end house items,” which made up ~40% of Fab’s product listings. He determined to take a position what was left of Fab’s funding — about $80m — into Hem, and dump Fab’s remaining belongings. In early 2015, he finalized a take care of PCH Improvements to promote for a reported $15m — a fraction of Fab’s one-time $1B valuation. A yr later, Hem would promote for even much less. Goldberg’s unicorn was lifeless. Beginning over What does an entrepreneur do after burning via $330m+? “My persona is that I at all times need to make everybody glad,” Goldberg mentioned in 2017. “I let down our buyers, and it was a horrible feeling.” On the similar time, Goldberg mentioned this “make everybody glad” perspective led to sturdy bonds together with his buyers that final to at the present time. “Give a few of these early buyers a name and ask him what they consider Jason Goldberg,” he mentioned. “I’m positive they’d put money into a Jason Goldberg firm once more.” Goldberg at 2014 TechCrunch Disrupt Europe/London (Anthony Harvey/Getty Photographs for TechCrunch) Goldberg’s monitor report since Fab backs that up. In 2016, he raised $3m from buyers (together with among the similar buyers who’d guess on Fab) to launch a social messaging app referred to as Pepo. That very same yr, he launched a blockchain expertise platform (OST) and molded Pepo into an app to assist makers within the crypto house. He was thwarted once more — this time, by the hardships of COVID-19. So, he raised $2.2m to construct out an all-in-one platform to assist health instructors begin on-line companies. Fittingly, he referred to as it Moxie — a phrase that connotes a “combating spirit” and a refusal to surrender within the face of adversity. “I’m not the form of particular person who’s going to bury my head within the sand, lie on the seashore, and tune out,” he mentioned. “I need to construct stuff.” Share & focus on this story on: SPONSORED Professionally monitored safety  Acknowledge folks, not pets

  • What is Jobster's latest funding round?

    Jobster's latest funding round is Acquired.

  • Who are the investors of Jobster?

    Investors of Jobster include Zapoint.

Discover the right solution for your team

The CB Insights tech market intelligence platform analyzes millions of data points on vendors, products, partnerships, and patents to help your team find their next technology solution.

Request a demo

CBI websites generally use certain cookies to enable better interactions with our sites and services. Use of these cookies, which may be stored on your device, permits us to improve and customize your experience. You can read more about your cookie choices at our privacy policy here. By continuing to use this site you are consenting to these choices.