
Doppler
Founded Year
2018Stage
Series A | AliveTotal Raised
$28.95MLast Raised
$20M | 2 yrs agoAbout Doppler
Doppler operates as a multi-cloud secret operations (SecretOps) platform for enterprise-level data encryption and management. It allows users to synchronize, manage, orchestrate, and rotate secrets across any environment or application with the help of easy-to-use tools. The company was founded in 2018 and is based in Walnut, California.
Loading...
Doppler's Product Videos

ESPs containing Doppler
The ESP matrix leverages data and analyst insight to identify and rank leading companies in a given technology landscape.
The data access governance market offers various technologies to control and monitor data access. This ensures only authorized users can view, modify, or share specific information to help to safeguard sensitive information and comply with industry regulations. Common capabilities include identity and access management (IAM) systems, role-based access control (RBAC), encryption techniques, multi-f…
Doppler named as Challenger among 15 other companies, including BigID, SailPoint, and Armis.
Doppler's Products & Differentiators
Doppler
Cloud-based secrets managed solution that integrates with all major cloud providers and provides a central source of truth for your secrets.
Loading...
Research containing Doppler
Get data-driven expert analysis from the CB Insights Intelligence Unit.
CB Insights Intelligence Analysts have mentioned Doppler in 2 CB Insights research briefs, most recently on Sep 6, 2023.

Sep 6, 2023
The data security market mapExpert Collections containing Doppler
Expert Collections are analyst-curated lists that highlight the companies you need to know in the most important technology spaces.
Doppler is included in 1 Expert Collection, including Cybersecurity.
Cybersecurity
7,291 items
These companies protect organizations from digital threats.
Latest Doppler News
Nov 24, 2023
Abstract Coherent microwave-to-optical conversion is crucial for transferring quantum information generated in the microwave domain to optical frequencies, where propagation losses can be minimized. Coherent, atom-based transducers have shown rapid progress in recent years. This paper reports an experimental demonstration of coherent microwave-to-optical conversion that maps a microwave signal to a large, tunable 550(30) MHz range of optical frequencies using room-temperature 87Rb atoms. The inhomogeneous Doppler broadening of the atomic vapor advantageously supports the tunability of an input microwave channel to any optical frequency channel within the Doppler width, along with the simultaneous conversion of a multi-channel input microwave field to corresponding optical channels. In addition, we demonstrate phase-correlated amplitude control of select channels, providing an analog to a frequency domain beam splitter across five orders of magnitude in frequency. With these capabilities, neutral atomic systems may also be effective quantum processors for quantum information encoded in frequency-bin qubits. Introduction Quantum information processing using solid-state qubits, such as superconducting qubits or spins associated with defects in solid state systems, has shown rapid progress in the field of quantum information technology 1 , 2 . The typical operation frequency of these devices is ~10 GHz, in the microwave region of the electromagnetic spectrum. Due to the inherent room-temperature thermal-photon occupation of cables at GHz frequencies that leads to signal noise, practical implementation of scalable and distributed quantum networks at these frequencies poses a formidable challenge 3 . In recent years, progress has been made in addressing coherent conversion of signals from the microwave to optical regimes 4 , 5 : at optical frequencies, not only are the thermal noise photons negligible at room temperature, but there exist efficient single-photon detectors and technologies for quantum state storage and reconstruction. Several systems have been used to coherently convert signals at microwave frequencies to the optical regime. These include electro- and magneto-optical devices 6 , 7 , opto-mechanical structures, 8 and atoms with suitable internal energy level spacings 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 . Impressive progress on improving the efficiency of the conversion process led to efficiency near 80% 11 , and the largest reported conversion bandwidths of an input microwave signal are 15–16 MHz 12 , 13 , 14 . Along with conversion bandwidth, a transducer that can accommodate several channels of input and output frequencies is advantageous, and tunability over input microwave frequencies across 3 GHz width was recently reported 15 . Yet, transducers that operate over multiple optical output frequencies have not been demonstrated to date. In this article we show that a limited bandwidth input microwave signal can be converted to a large tunable range of output optical frequencies, across 550(30) MHz. This capacity enables information encoded in a narrow-bandwidth microwave field to be mapped to several frequencies in the optical domain, achieving coherent frequency-division multiplexing (FDM). The ability to tune the optical signal output over such a large frequency range arises because of the presence of a large inhomogeneous optical Doppler width for Rb atoms at room temperature. The Doppler width also enables an input multiple-channel microwave idler to be simultaneously and coherently converted to a multiple-channel optical-signal output. In addition, we demonstrate correlated amplitude control of the converted multi-channel optical field with the ability to selectively extinguish a desired output frequency channel. This action is very similar to the frequency domain beam-splitting operation for frequency bins, demonstrated using electro-optic modulators (EOMs) and pulse shapers 16 . Results Coherent frequency-division multiplexing enables qubits encoded in a microwave frequency to be placed in any desired output optical channel within the range of tunability. Multiple qubits in different input microwave channels can also be coherently mapped to the optical domain. The ability to control the amplitude of selected output optical channels is very useful in performing single-qubit-gate operations spanning involving both microwave and optical frequencies. With a channel linewidth of about 30 Hz, this results in a large channel capacity of about 107 channels over the output tunable range. Thus neutral atom systems are a promising candidate as a quantum frequency processor platform 17 for quantum information encoded in frequency bin qubits. Numerical model Microwave-to-optical conversion in a room-temperature 87Rb atomic vapor is possible through a sum-frequency generation (SFG) process analogous to a RF mixer [Fig. 1 a] and depicted in Fig. 1 c. The nonlinear process uses a hybrid, magneto-optical second-order [χ(2)] susceptibility induced in the vapor by the interaction of three energy levels with an optical pump (electric-dipole transition) and a microwave idler (magnetic-dipole transition) fields. (Note that isotropic atomic systems with only electric-dipole transitions have a χ(2) of zero.) The idler field (ωI) is supported by the TE011 mode of a cylindrical copper microwave cavity 18 , 19 [Fig. 1 b] and connects the \(\vert b\rangle \equiv \vert 5{S}_{1/2},F=1\rangle\) and \(\vert c\rangle \equiv \vert 5{S}_{1/2},F=2\rangle\) ground state levels. The pump frequency ωP is, chosen anywhere within the Doppler width [Fig. 1c ], and connects the \(\left\vert c\right\rangle\) and \(\vert a\rangle \equiv \vert 5{P}_{3/2},{F}^{{\prime} }=1,2\rangle\) levels. We define δ as the detuning of the pump field from the the mid-energy point between the \(\left\vert {F}^{{\prime} }=1\right\rangle\) and \(\left\vert {F}^{{\prime} }=2\right\rangle\) excited levels. In SFG, the pump combines coherently with the idler to generate a new optical signal field at frequency ωS = ωP + ωI. Fig. 1: Main components of the experiment. a Schematic of the atomic frequency-division multiplexing scheme. The microwave cavity-vapor cell system acts analogously to an RF mixer, and information encoded in idler (yellow) channels (▲, ●, ■) is combined coherently with multiple pump (red) channels to produce many output signal (blue) channels over a range of optical frequencies. b A representation of our microwave cavity and the generation process. The optical pump beam passes transversely through the cavity and cell and is polarized along the z-axis, parallel to a weak magnetic field. The cavity’s TE011 mode overlaps with the pump interaction region inside the vapor cell. The arrows define the beam propagation and polarization directions. c Three-level energy diagram showing the cyclical transition scheme. The idler (ωI) and pump (ωP) fields combine coherently in the vapor to produce the signal field (ωS). The frequencies shown are for 87Rb; in a room-temperature vapor, the excited state addressed by the pump field is Doppler-broadened by ~550 MHz. We begin by establishing a numerical model that explains the large frequency tunability and multi-channel conversion capability observed in this experiment, similar to that discussed for a generic, three-level, room-temperature atomic system, with interacting idler, pump, and signal fields 20 . The Rabi frequencies of the idler and pump fields at position z are ΩI(z) = μcb ⋅ BI(z) and ΩP(z) = dac ⋅ EP(z), where Δφ is the relative phase between the fields, and μcb and dac are the dipole matrix elements between \(\left\vert c\right\rangle \,\& \,\left\vert b\right\rangle\) and \(\left\vert a\right\rangle \,\& \,\left\vert c\right\rangle\) levels. The signal field is generated due to a sum-frequency interaction between the idler and pump fields. The Rabi frequency of the generated signal field ΩS(ℓ) after a medium of length ℓ, under a rotating wave and three-photon transformation, is (see Supplementary Note 4) $${\Omega }_{{{{{{{{\rm{S}}}}}}}}}(\ell )=\frac{i{\Omega }_{{{{{{{{\rm{P}}}}}}}}}(0){\Omega }_{{{{{{{{\rm{I}}}}}}}}}(0){e}^{-i\Delta \varphi }}{2{\Gamma }_{2}}({e}^{-\beta \ell }-1),$$ (1) where the constant $$\beta =\frac{2{\eta }_{{{{{{{{\rm{S}}}}}}}}}{\Gamma }_{2}{\Gamma }_{3}}{4{\Gamma }_{1}{\Gamma }_{2}{\Gamma }_{3}+{\Gamma }_{3}| {\Omega }_{{{{{{{{\rm{P}}}}}}}}}(0){| }^{2}+{\Gamma }_{2}| {\Omega }_{{{{{{{{\rm{I}}}}}}}}}(0){| }^{2}},$$ (2) and $${\Gamma }_{1}= \frac{{\gamma }_{{{{{{{{\rm{P}}}}}}}}}}{2}+\frac{{\gamma }_{{{{{{{{\rm{S}}}}}}}}}}{2}-i\,{\Delta }_{{{{{{{{\rm{S}}}}}}}}}({{{{{{{\boldsymbol{v}}}}}}}}),\\ {\Gamma }_{2}= \frac{1}{2}{\gamma }_{{{{{{{{\rm{I}}}}}}}}}-i\left[{\Delta }_{{{{{{{{\rm{S}}}}}}}}}({{{{{{{\boldsymbol{v}}}}}}}})-{\Delta }_{{{{{{{{\rm{P}}}}}}}}}({{{{{{{\boldsymbol{v}}}}}}}})\right],\\ {\Gamma }_{3}= \frac{{\gamma }_{{{{{{{{\rm{P}}}}}}}}}}{2}+\frac{{\gamma }_{{{{{{{{\rm{S}}}}}}}}}}{2}+\frac{{\gamma }_{{{{{{{{\rm{I}}}}}}}}}}{2}-i\,{\Delta }_{{{{{{{{\rm{P}}}}}}}}}({{{{{{{\boldsymbol{v}}}}}}}}),\\ {\eta }_{{{{{{{{\rm{S}}}}}}}}}(v)= {{{{{{{{\boldsymbol{d}}}}}}}}}_{{{{{{{{\rm{ac}}}}}}}}}^{2}{\omega }_{s}N(v)/2{\epsilon }_{0}c,$$ (3) with N(v) is the number density of atoms in the velocity class with v = ∣v∣. The value N(v) is the Maxwell-Boltzmann (MB) velocity distribution of atoms at room temperature. The Doppler-shifted detunings of the pump and the generated signal fields, as seen from the atom frame [Fig. ( 2 a, iii–v)], are denoted as ΔP = δP − kP ⋅ v and ΔS = δS − kS ⋅ v, while the corresponding detunings in the lab frame are δP & δS [Figs. 1 c and 2 a, i]. The microwave idler field has negligible Doppler shift for all velocity values. The natural decay rates from the \(\left\vert a\right\rangle\) level to both the \(\left\vert c\right\rangle\) and \(\left\vert b\right\rangle\) levels are denoted by γP and γS, respectively [Fig. 1 c]. Fig. 2: Numerical simulations. a i Lab-frame cartoon depicting multiple pump frequency channels (central-green, upper-purple, lower-organge) combining with a single idler (yellow) to produce multiple signal channels. a ii These pump frequencies access independent atomic velocity classes from a thermal MB distribution. (a-iii to a-v) In their reference frame, atoms in these velocity classes see the respective pump frequency Doppler-shifted to resonance. Generation occurs in the velocity class for which the three-photon resonance condition (i.e. energy conservation) is satisfied. b Calculated spectra of an amplitude-modulated idler field showing sidebands (SBs); the carrier and SBs combine with the pump to produce a multichannel signal spectrum. c When the idler and pump are both modulated at the same frequency, multiple generation pathways interfere producing an upper and lower generated signal SBs. The input fields each have lower (▲), central (●), and upper (■) spectral peaks. d Calculated curves showing correlated signal SB amplitudes, which vary coherently with the relative phase of the two modulations depicted in (c). Both AM and PM modulation indices are 0.2. $${\Delta }_{{{{{{{{\rm{S}}}}}}}}}({{{{{{{\boldsymbol{v}}}}}}}})-{\Delta }_{{{{{{{{\rm{P}}}}}}}}}({{{{{{{\boldsymbol{v}}}}}}}})=0.$$ (4) Typically, the wavelengths of optical fields are such that k ≡ ∣kS∣ ≈ ∣kP∣ ≫ ∣kI∣, in which case Eq. ( 4 ) reduces to (δS − δP) = 0. Since the signal and pump fields travel in the same direction, the phase-matching condition kI + kP = kS is automatically satisfied for all atomic velocity classes. The maximum signal generation for each velocity class is obtained when δS of the signal-field is the same as the pump-field detuning δP, such that different velocity classes participate in the maximum signal-field generation at different pump-field detunings. Therefore, changing the laboratory pump frequency within the Doppler width to \({\omega }_{{{{{{{{\rm{P}}}}}}}}}^{{\prime} }={\omega }_{{{{{{{{\rm{P}}}}}}}}}+\delta\) gives rise to a corresponding signal field at \({\omega }_{{{{{{{{\rm{S}}}}}}}}}^{{\prime} }={\omega }_{{{{{{{{\rm{S}}}}}}}}}+\delta\), thus enabling a large tunable generation bandwidth. This is depicted numerically in Fig. 2 a, ii for atoms at T = 300 °C. The shape of the generated signal field is primarily determined by the MB velocity distribution. The broad Doppler width at room temperature and guaranteed phase-matching for sum-frequency generation [Eq. ( 4 )] make possible the simultaneous conversion of multi-channel microwave field inputs to a multi-channel optical signal outputs [Fig. 2 b]. Multiple frequency channels in the idler and pump fields are obtained by either amplitude or phase modulation. Specifically, the idler field amplitude is modulated as \({\Omega }_{{{{{{{{\rm{I}}}}}}}}}(t)={\Omega }_{{{{{{{{\rm{I0}}}}}}}}}(1+{a}_{m}\sin ({\omega }_{{{{{{{{\rm{AM}}}}}}}}})t)\) and phase modulation of the pump field takes the form \({\Omega }_{{{{{{{{\rm{P}}}}}}}}}(t)={\Omega }_{{{{{{{{\rm{P0}}}}}}}}}\sin ({\omega }_{{{{{{{{\rm{P}}}}}}}}}t+{p}_{m}\sin ({\omega }_{{{{{{{{\rm{PM}}}}}}}}})t+\Delta \phi )\). The symbols am and pm denote amplitude and phase modulation indices. The modulation frequencies are ωAM and ωPM and Δϕ denotes the relative phase between the two modulation fields. By multiplying the modulated idler and pump fields to obtain the signal field, we derive the amplitudes for the generated signal field and its first-order side-bands for the case of equal modulation frequencies ωAM = ωPM = δ and for equal modulation indices ap = am = 0.2. At equal modulation frequencies, the pump and idler fields associated with the sideband channels interfere with each other [Fig. 2 c] enabling control of their amplitudes through Δϕ 21 . The powers of the positive and negative sideband channels at ωS ± δ are proportional to \({a}_{m}^{2}+{a}_{p}^{2}+2{a}_{m}{a}_{p}\sin (\Delta \phi )\) and \({a}_{m}^{2}+{a}_{p}^{2}-2{a}_{m}{a}_{p}\sin (\Delta \phi )\) (see Supplementary Note 7 ). The power variations at ±δ sidebands, as a function of Δϕ, are shown in Fig. 2 d. Experimental results First, we show that light is generated on the \(\left\vert a\right\rangle \to \left\vert b\right\rangle\) transition. The χ(2) interaction mediated by these atoms between the pump and microwave fields results in a sum-frequency process that generates a corresponding signal optical field. By combining the generated optical light with an optical local oscillator, we detect the generated light at the heterodyne beat frequency fhet,S (see Methods and Fig. 3 a). Fig. 3: Experimental setup and main results. a Schematic of the experimental setup: Central to the experiment is a microwave cavity supporting a TE011 mode, polarized along the y-axis. The light incident on the cavity is polarized along the z-axis and propagates along the x-axis. The vapor cell inside the cavity has enriched 87Rb. Unshifted light from the external cavity diode laser (ECDL) is used as a local oscillator for heterodyne detection; it is combined with the other beam in a fiber 50:50 beam splitter (BS), producing two beat signals at fhet,P and fhet,S. AOM - Acousto-optic modulator; EOM - Electro-optic modulator; SG - signal generator; SA - spectrum analyzer; PD - photodiode. b The generated signal measured with the spectrum analyzer in zero-span mode, showing a FWHM of 550(25) MHz. The dashed curve shows the calculated Doppler-broadened absorption coefficient of the pump light; the individual components due to the \({F}^{{\prime} }=1\) and \({F}^{{\prime} }=2\) excited hyperfine levels are shown as dotted curves. Without any fitting or free parameters, the generated signal data is proportional to the MB absorption distribution of the pump transitions. c The generated signal amplitude responds roughly linearly to increased pump optical power. d The response of the generated signal amplitude to microwave powers from SG1. The largest pump and idler powers measured correspond to intensities of about 3 & 7 mW/cm2. Error bars represent the standard deviation. To probe the frequency-tunable nature of the conversion process, we scan the pump laser frequency across the Doppler width. At any instant during the scan, the pump field interacts with one velocity class of atoms, which see this frequency on resonance with the pump transition. The generated signal reaches a maximum amplitude between the \(F=2\to {F}^{{\prime} }=1\) and \({F}^{{\prime} }=2\) transitions [Fig. 3 b], with a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 550(25) MHz. This generated spectrum corresponds to the combined Doppler-dependent absorption coefficients for the \(F=1\to {F}^{{\prime} }=1,\,2\) transitions, which has a FWHM of 540 MHz. The \({F}^{{\prime} }=3\) state does not participate in this nonlinear process, since selection rules prohibit an electric-dipole transition to the F = 1 ground state. Similarly, the pump transition from \(F=2\to {F}^{{\prime} }=0\) is electric-dipole forbidden. We also characterize the effects of various pump and idler powers as shown in Fig. 3 c, d. For a good signal-to-noise ratio, we typically operated with a pump power near 76 μW and idler power of 3.2 mW. Next, we explore the multi-channel character of the conversion process. The pump laser is tuned halfway between the \(F=2\to {F}^{{\prime} }=2\,\& \,3\) transitions. By modulating either the idler or the pump, multiple frequency components are generated in the signal: First, we amplitude-modulate (AM) the microwave idler signal at ωAM and observe sidebands in the signal at ωS ± ωAM. The conversion bandwidth from idler modulation is limited to a maximum of 1 MHz by the width of the cavity resonance. Next, we additionally phase-modulate (PM) the pump using a fiber EOM in the optical path and observe that the idler and pump combine together as dictated by the sum-frequency process [Eq. ( 1 )]. The MB width and density determine the bandwidth and amplitudes of the pump-modulated generated sidebands. Both types of sideband generation are illustrated in Fig. 4 a, including simultaneous idler AM and pump PM. In the three cases depicted, ωAM/2π = 50 kHz is fixed and ωPM/2π is varied from 10 MHz to 100 MHz. Fig. 4: Sideband generation and interference. a–i Multichannel generation using a fixed microwave amplitude modulation frequency of ωAM/2π = 50 kHz and a variable pump phase modulation frequency ωPM/2π of 10 (blue), 50 (red) and 100 (black) MHz. The relative sideband amplitude decreases for increased ωPM because the pump light accesses velocity classes with decreased occupation. a–ii Zoomed-in data revealing AM sidebands flanking each of the central and SB PM peaks. b When the two modulation frequencies are equal, i.e. ωPM = ωAM, the PM and AM sidebands overlap and interfere. The relative phase difference Δϕ between the modulating waves controls the height of the correlated upper (■, blue) and lower (▲, red) generated sidebands. (b-i) The generated spectrum at zero relative phase. b–ii The relative power amplitude response of the peaks have a visibility of 97%, while the central peak (●, purple) is independent of the relative phase. The two SB amplitudes differ from each other by (π − 0.38) radians of phase. The dashed lines show independent fits to a cosine. When the pump and idler are modulated at the same frequency, ωPM = ωAM, the sidebands from each input overlap and interfere [Fig. 4 b-i]. By tuning the relative phase of the modulating waves, one sideband or the other can be selectively enhanced or eliminated, with a relative visibility of 97% [Fig. 4 b-ii], in qualitative agreement with the calculated variation shown in Fig. 2 d. The efficiency of conversion from microwave to signal photons is defined as the rate of signal photon production to the rate of microwave photons residing in the cavity mode 9 , 10 $$\eta \equiv \frac{{P}_{{{{{{{{\rm{signal}}}}}}}}}/\hslash {\omega }_{{{{{{{{\rm{signal}}}}}}}}}}{{P}_{{{{{{{{\rm{idler}}}}}}}}}/\hslash {\omega }_{{{{{{{{\rm{idler}}}}}}}}}}.$$ (5) Further details on this calculation are included in Supplementary Notes 2 , 3 and 6 . We determine a maximum conversion efficiency of η0 = 1.5(1) × 10−9. Efficiency in our system is primarily limited by a very low optical depth of 0.05(1). In comparison, cold atom conversion experiments have employed optical depths of up to 15 9 and 120 11 . Our optical depth corresponds to a number density of about 4 × 1016 cm−3 with 8.7(1) × 108 atoms in the interaction region. This atom number is ~109 times lower than the 3.2(1) × 1018 available microwave photons in the same volume. At room temperature, the thermal noise is at the level of 900 photons, which is indiscernible compared to the signals used here. We note that it is this noise, determined by the temperature of the microwave electronics and transmission components (rather than of the conversion medium), that sets the limit of low-photon-number operation. Moving toward true quantum transduction requires reducing the noise in these components by operating at cryogenic temperatures 22 . Discussion The frequency tunability of the generated signal field results from the existence of a large Doppler width at room temperature. While this work uses a warm vapor cell of enriched 87Rb without an anti-relaxation coating or a buffer gas, a buffer gas would provide additional tunability due to collisional broadening 23 , 24 , 25 . This tunability is ultimately limited to the order of the ground-state hyperfine splitting of the atoms used. While other conversion schemes display degrees of tunability of the output frequency 9 , 11 , 14 , 15 , these are often restricted by natural atomic or optical cavity resonance frequencies. In the warm-atom system, a continuous tunability over the entire Doppler width is possible. This frequency multiplexing capability enables multiple microwave sources to be interfaced with a single atomic transducer, and the conversion can be used to place differing sources in distinct optical frequency domains. Switching between different optical frequencies for a single source is also possible. Our scheme features a conversion bandwidth of 910(20) kHz [see Fig. 6 b], which is primarily limited by the cavity linewidth. As previously demonstrated in a different context 26 , the reverse optical-to-microwave conversion process is achievable in an atomic three-wave mixing system. The high-contrast amplitude control of signal sidebands enabled by simultaneous pump and idler modulation [Fig. 4 b] is equivalent to a tunable beam-splitter operating in the frequency domain 16 . The modulation indices and the relative phase act together as reflection and transmission coeffiecients. For particular values of these coefficients we can selectively generate a chosen sideband channel in the optical domain while completely suppressing the other, resulting in single-sideband conversion. Thus, our neutral atom system is capable of performing as a “quantum frequency processor” 17 , 27 , 28 with particularly low input-field intensities. This allows us not only to encode and manipulate information in multiplexed frequency bins but also to convert it from microwave to optical frequency domains. The measured conversion efficiency is comparable with magnon-based microwave-to-optical conversion schemes 14 , 15 . The warm-atom efficiency is inherently limited by the intrinsic weakness of the magnetic-dipole microwave transition, as well as the ground-state spin decoherence γI which includes wall-collisions, transit-time decoherence, and Rb-Rb spin-exchange collisions (see Supplementary Note 5 ). A larger optical beam combined with a buffer gas 29 , 30 and anti-relaxation coating on the cell walls 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 would help reduce spin decoherence from the dark state and boost conversion efficiency. For example, we expect that a high-quality anti-relaxation coating and a modest 5 torr of neon would significantly reduce transit-time and wall effects, and reduce γI/2π by a factor of 103 to 100 Hz, limited by Rb-Rb spin-exchange. Everything else being equal, this would provide a 106-fold improvement to the generation efficiency. Furthermore, based on 10 , we expect that increased pump powers will produce a moderate 4-fold efficiency gain before the efficiency saturates due to absorption and incoherent scattering of the pump. In this proof-of-concept demonstration, we have shown that inhomogeneous Doppler broadening in a warm vapor cell provides significant tunability of the output optical frequency in a microwave-optical transduction, resulting in frequency division multiplexing. The inhomogeneous width also enables simultaneous frequency up-conversion of multi-channel microwave inputs. Amplitude control of up-converted optical channels demonstrates analogous frequency domain beam splitting action across five orders in frequency. The frequency division multiplexing capability combined with amplitude control can make neutral atoms as quantum processors for information encoded in frequency bin qubits. Methods Experimental setup The experimental setup can be seen in Fig. 3 a. The pump optical field is derived from an continuous-wave external cavity diode laser (MOGLabs CEL) operating at 780.24 nm. This laser is frequency-stabilized to the saturated absorption spectrum of a separate Rb reference vapor cell. We have the option to lock the laser frequency 80 MHz below the \({F}^{{\prime} }\) = 2–3 crossover transition with a locked linewidth of ~100 kHz. Alternatively, we can unlock and move the laser frequency off-resonance. The pump beam is then shifted upwards in frequency by fAOM = 76.60 MHz with an acousto-optical modulator and transmitted to the cavity-vapor cell apparatus via optical fiber. After the optical fiber, the polarization is filtered with a polarizing beam splitter (PBS) and the power of the pump light is stabilized with a servo controller (NuFocus LB1005) to <1% fluctuations. The Rabi frequency of the pump laser ΩP/2π has a value of 3.5 MHz 35 and it is linearly polarized along the z-axis. Inside the cavity 18 , 19 , the idler microwave field is polarized along the y-direction. Orthogonal Helmholtz coils null the external magnetic field along the x and y-axes and apply a weak DC magnetic field \({\overrightarrow{B}}_{z}\) along the z-axis. The magnetic field strength makes a striking impact on the conversion efficiency. As shown in Fig. 5 a, conversion is strongly suppressed at zero magnetic field and reaches maxima at ~±200 mG. This behavior is well-described by a symmetric, generalized Fano lineshape 36 that has the simplified form $$\eta ({B}_{z})={\eta }_{0}^{{\prime} }{\left[\frac{2{\gamma }_{B}({B}_{z}-{B}_{0})}{{\gamma }_{B}^{2}+{({B}_{z}-{B}_{0})}^{2}}\right]}^{2}.$$ (6) This points to the participation and interaction of multiple Zeeman levels in the generation process. At Zeeman degeneracy, generation pathways may destructively interfere. The value γB × γ0 = 140 kHz ~ γI, the ground state decoherence rate, where γ0 is the ground state gyromagnetic ratio of 87Rb 37 . Further discussion goes beyond the scope of this work and will be the topic of future investigation. Fig. 5: Magnetic field effect and generated linewidth. a The generated signal’s response to a variable magnetic field strength \({\overrightarrow{B}}_{z}\) along the z-axis. Wte operate at 209 mG for maximum generation. We fit a symmetric Fano profile [Eq. ( 6 )] to these data, with fit parameters \({\eta }_{0}^{{\prime} }=0.95(2)\), γB = 200(4)mG and B0 = − 5(3)mG. This behavior might indicate the interaction and interference of multiple Zeeman level resonances within the decoherence width of our atoms. Error bars represent the standard deviation. b A close up of the unmodulated generated line revealing a FWHM of 26(2) Hz. Multichannel conversion We generate a multichannel optical signal field in two different ways: first, the signal generator (SG1) supplying the idler field is amplitude-modulated at a variable ωAM. We note that due the finite microwave cavity resonance (see Supplementary Note 1 ), ωAM/2π can be tuned up to 455(10) kHz before the sidebands become significantly suppressed. Second, we modulate the pump light by using a fiber phase-modulator EOM (EOSPACE PM-0S5-20-PFA-PFA-780) inserted into the pump light optical path. We drive the EOM with a second signal generator (SG2, SRS SG384) at a variable ωPM. This produces sidebands in the pump optical spectrum, and corresponding sidebands are visible in the generated spectrum around the heterodyne frequency fhet,S. The SA and SG2 are both phase-locked to the internal 10 MHz clock reference of SG1. In this second case, ωPM can be tuned over the Doppler FWHM before the sidebands become significantly suppressed. Conversion bandwidth We characterize the conversion bandwidth of our microwave-to-optical conversion process. To do this, we replace SG1 and SA with Ports 1 and 2, respectively of a VNA (Keysight E5063A). The generated signal is measured on the VNA in S21 mode and is shown in Fig. 6 b. When the laser is locked on resonance and at the optimal magnetic field of 209 mG, a clear peak in the S21 signal is visible with FWHM = 910(20) kHz. This width is compared to the 417 kHz width of the cavity resonance. When the laser is off-resonance, no generation is apparent. Data availability The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the University of Alberta Dataverse Borealis repository, https://borealisdata.ca/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.5683/SP3/LGCNHZ . References Acknowledgements We gratefully acknowledge that this work was performed on Treaty 6 territory, and as researchers at the University of Alberta, we respect the histories, languages, and cultures of First Nations, Métis, Inuit, and all First Peoples of Canada, whose presence continues to enrich our vibrant community. We are indebted to Clinton Potts for machining the microwave cavity used in this work. We are also grateful to the John Davis, Mark Freeman, Robert Wolkow, and the Vadim Kravchinsky groups for generously lending equipment used in these experiments, and to Ray DeCorby for helpful feedback on this work. This work was supported by the University of Alberta; the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, Canada (Grants No. RGPIN-2021-02884 and No. CREATE-495446-17); the Alberta Quantum Major Innovation Fund; Alberta Innovates; the Canada Foundation for Innovation; and the Canada Research Chairs (CRC) Program. Author information Rights and permissions Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .
Doppler Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
When was Doppler founded?
Doppler was founded in 2018.
Where is Doppler's headquarters?
Doppler's headquarters is located at 340 South Lemon Avenue , Walnut.
What is Doppler's latest funding round?
Doppler's latest funding round is Series A.
How much did Doppler raise?
Doppler raised a total of $28.95M.
Who are the investors of Doppler?
Investors of Doppler include Google Ventures, Sequoia Capital, Olivier Pomel, Frederic Kerrest, Y Combinator and 22 more.
Who are Doppler's competitors?
Competitors of Doppler include Akeyless and 5 more.
What products does Doppler offer?
Doppler's products include Doppler.
Who are Doppler's customers?
Customers of Doppler include Whatnot, Puma and Outreach.
Loading...
Compare Doppler to Competitors

Fortanix offers a unified data security platform. It allows users to run applications securely in public clouds with complete privacy from the cloud provider. It serves healthcare, technology, university, and payment companies. The company was founded in 2016 and is based in Mountain View, California.
Desilo develops a data security platform. It specializes in digital property protection, privacy safeguarding, regulatory compliance services, and other security technology. The company was founded in 2020 and is based in Seoul, South Korea.

Jit is a company that focuses on providing a DevSecOps Orchestration Platform in the technology and cybersecurity industry. The company offers a platform that automates the process of selecting, implementing, configuring, and managing application security toolchains, enabling high-velocity engineering teams to own product security while increasing development velocity. The platform also provides a unified and friendly developer experience, continuous monitoring of product security posture, and intelligent invocation of appropriate security tools based on the content of the repository. It was founded in 2021 and is based in Tel Aviv, Israel.

Akeyless provides cybersecurity solutions by developing a security management platform. Its platform protects and manages credentials, certificates, and keys used by machines in both hybrid and multi-cloud environments. Akeyless serves medium to large-sized enterprises. The company was founded in 2018 and is based in Ramat Gan, Israel.

Cycloid is a company that focuses on platform engineering in the software delivery sector. The company offers a platform that improves the developer and end-user experience by allowing anyone to use any tools, cloud, and automation without expert knowledge, thereby improving operational efficiency. It also provides modules around Governance, Deployment, Operations, FinOps, and GreenOps. It was founded in 2015 and is based in Paris, France.

UBIqube is a company that focuses on providing hybrid cloud management solutions, operating within the cloud computing industry. The company's main services include orchestration, automation, and application deployment for hybrid cloud environments, aiming to simplify and secure the management of these systems. UBIqube primarily serves organizations in need of smooth transitions to hybrid cloud systems. It was founded in 2006 and is based in Dublin, Ireland.
Loading...