CHICAGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--CCC Intelligent Solutions Inc. (CCC), a leading cloud platform powering the P&C insurance economy, announces today the availability of its annual Crash Course report, which identifies trends impacting the P&C insurance economy, a multifaceted industry advancing the future of personal mobility and safer roadways. The report delivers insights on the convergence of economic, social, and technological shifts that are reshaping driving behaviors, vehicle ownership,

CCC Releases 2023 Crash Course Report, Providing Market Data and Insights on the Trends Impacting the P&amp;C Insurance Economy

| Cryptocurrency Training Course Report Released
Share
Celrbug has released a comprehensive review of Dan Holling’s The Plan cryptocurrency training course, a trading strategy program designed for investors of all levels. Orleans,Canada - November 7, 2022 /PressCable/ —
The recently released report, compiled by Michael Chang-Fong, is intended to help those interested in the training program get a better idea of the course based on the writers’ own experience. The review covers the advantages and the potential risks of The Plan, what the course offers in terms of crypto knowledge, and a few other important details related to the structure and pricing of the product. The full report can be found at https://celrbug.com/benefits-cons-risks-of-dan-hollings-the-plan-phase-1-online-cryptocurrency-course-beginner-crypto-student-use-report
Celrbug’s new review takes an unbiased look at Dan Holling’s The Plan crypto trading course, which has recently gained increased recognition from the crypto community at large. According to Celrbug, the program has a number of potential advantages to offer with some risks involved as well, which this report can help traders navigate. Unlike other reviews of Dan Holling’s program, Celrbug’s report shares a trader’s first-hand, directly transcribed experience with the audience rather than providing a play-by-play breakdown. The goal is to make other crypto traders, particularly beginners, aware of the course execution and implementation results the writer has encountered. The report details both the usefulness of the training program as well as the rationale behind it and explains why the average cryptocurrency enthusiast might be interested in enrolling. Celrbug’s report allows the reader to take a more holistic view of Dan Holling’s program by recapping the highlights of The Plan. These highlights include Dan Holling’s encouraging, competent instructional style, which the Celrbug reviewer says would help participants absorb much more of the content. Other advantages include the accessibility of the training and the quality customer support available. The report concludes by highlighting Dan Holling’s recent updates to the program to adapt it to the current market landscape. The market is currently bearish across the board, but the review emphasizes the ways in which Holling’s strategies can be adjusted and be still effective in a downward-trending market landscape. More details are available at https://celrbug.com/benefits-cons-risks-of-dan-hollings-the-plan-phase-1-online-cryptocurrency-course-beginner-crypto-student-use-report
Disclaimer: The information provided on this page does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, trading advice, or any other sort of advice and it should not be treated as such. This content is the opinion of a third party and this site does not recommend that any specific cryptocurrency should be bought, sold, or held, or that any crypto investment should be made. The Crypto market is high risk, with high-risk and unproven projects. Readers should do their own research and consult a professional financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Contact Info:

Dan Hollings The Plan Phase 1 | Cryptocurrency Training Course Report Released

Share This Press Release
Women on Amazon launched a report on the bonus package for Dan Hollings The Plan ahead of the latest course, which starts on 16 December. The new package features a ‘no student left behind’ policy. Camberwell, Australia - December 8, 2021 / PressCable / —
According to the latest report, the new bonus package for Dan Hollings The Plan includes a copy of the Bitcoin book “One Coin, Two Coin, What Coin?” There is also a Coin Pair Research service for 2 months included, which is invaluable to any new crypto traders. Four other bonus features: personal support from experienced trader, Regina Peterburgsky via Facebook Messenger, access to a dedicated Facebook Community, a graduate support group and access to her live crypto bots. Find out more at https://danhollingstheplanreview.com/the-plan-best-bonus
The new report explains that this package was created to support those taking The Plan with Dan Hollings training. For instance, everyone who completes the training program is then invited to join the graduate support group so individuals can continue to receive and give support. Another advantage of the graduate group is the fact it provides a space for members to share details of the crypto bots that are providing a return on investment. The Hive Mind approach is a way to bring members together to further their understanding of cryptocurrencies and investing. As stated in the report, the next course begins on 16 December and will include a Crypto Automations Masterclass. It includes the core strategies when dealing with cryptos, how to build wealth, and proven concepts to help students manage their risk. There are six key sessions that cover everything students need to know about crypto automation. They can also test what they have learned by creating their own automation tools. The demo software provides a space for students to test their knowledge and build confidence without risking any capital. There is no pressure to invest in cryptos while training. Students are empowered to manage their finances and can choose to build up funds to invest or invest while they learn. The author cites the unrivalled support students receive during and after completing the course as one of the key features of Dan Hollings The Plan. A recent graduate wrote: “I feel crypto is the future of finance and that the advantages will go to the early adopters. The Plan allows me to maintain a position in crypto whilst using its current volatility as a positive feature.”
Interested parties can learn more by visiting https://danhollingstheplanreview.com/the-plan-best-bonus
Disclaimer: The information provided on this page does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, trading advice, or any other sort of advice and it should not be treated as such. This content is the opinion of a third party, and this site does not recommend that any specific cryptocurrency should be bought, sold, or held, or that any crypto investment should be made. The Crypto market is high risk, with high-risk and unproven projects. Readers should do their own research and consult a professional financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Contact Info:

Dan Hollings The Plan Bonus Package – December 2021 Crypto Course Report Launch

Email address
By clicking ‘Sign up’, you agree to receive marketing emails from Insider                              as well as other partner offers and accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy . Last month, I reported on what appears to be exaggerated reports on student outcomes by the coding bootcamp Lambda School. According to my reporting, the school's job placement rate for its graduates was around 30% — far lower than the 74% it currently advertises. My reporting showed that the school's advertised rates omit a large section of its graduates. The school itself countered that any such discrepancies were simply a result of standard practices for bootcamp outcomes reporting. In this, they may be correct: General Assembly, for example, dropped more than 30% of its graduates for not "participating" fully with its career services. With these nonparticipants removed, they could then claim that the remaining 99.2% of their graduates successfully found jobs. Flatiron School, with over 2000 students, omitted 22% as non job-seeking . Other schools like Coding Dojo excluded as many as 40% of graduates . Coding bootcamps are private, for-profit schools that typically take adults with some work experience and retrain them as computer programmers. They cost between $10,000 and $20,000, around 15 percent of an entry-level salary in tech — a price that is well-worth it if the student lands a job. Last year 35,000 students graduated from these bootcamps. Uniquely among postsecondary schools, bootcamps have a cultural history of disclosing important numbers about how many of their graduates get jobs. However, not all bootcamp reports are equal. In their quest to compete with each other for enrollments, bootcamps have a potential financial interest in overstating their effectiveness, and prospective students should be wise to a few of the tricks the biggest bootcamps employ. Cherry-picking data is rife among the largest bootcamps 
According to Course Report's 2020 survey of bootcamp graduates, students primarily chose schools for the perceived outcomes of alumni, according to Course Report's 2020 survey of bootcamp graduates . Placement rates are the most visible estimate a student has for whether their career switch will be successful. Looking closely at the aforementioned schools you'll find graduates are routinely omitted from their tally for a number of reasons including being unresponsive to career services or failing to apply to enough jobs in a week. Some schools omitted as much as 40% of its graduates from its placement rates. A Lambda School instructor told Insider, the rate of non-responsiveness at bootcamps is alarming. "Maybe students aren't responding to you because they're angry with you. Maybe they're not responding because they're ashamed. " 
Typically, these "non-job-seeking" students are designated as such after they've graduated from the program — which is a red flag, according to Sheree Speakman, a former CEO of the Council of Integrity in Results Reporting (CIRR), a nonprofit that tracks bootcamp performance. General Assembly spokesperson, Tom Ogletree, told Insider, omitted students chose to "go it on their own" and their 99% placement figure was one piece of data that prospective students seek before enrolling. Coding Dojo spokesperson, Luke Lappala, told Insider, that students who are unresponsive "are classified as opted out of Career Services due to nonresponsiveness" and this is "explicitly conveyed in our reporting." Flatiron School did not respond to a request for comment. Speakman says nearly all boot-camp students classify themselves as "job-seeking" when they start their programs, because these programs are designed for students looking for a career in tech. The Course Report's survey similarly showed that 91% of graduates attended a bootcamp primarily to get a programming job. For this reason, bootcamps that report to CIRR ask students whether they are job-seeking before they enter a program and are not allowed to remove those students from their placement rates once they've graduated. According to Speakman, prospective students should beware of any non-job-seeking rate above 10%, as this is a sign that the school is seeking to remove the students who did poorly. CIRR does not allow after-the-fact removal of students from their tally. In general, students should be suspicious of results that are only published directly by the school. Prospective students should check to see whether placement performance for a particular school is available via a state regulator or on CIRR's website . Reports made to regulators or independent bodies are much more standardized and leave less room for creative accounting. Income Share Agreements and tuition refund programs can be too good to be true
Lambda School was also a pioneer in tuition deferral programs called "Income Share Agreements," where students pay a percentage of their salary only after receiving a job that pays $50,000 a year or more. Since then, similar programs have become widespread in the bootcamp industry. Some schools, like the e-learning platform Thinkful, even offer tuition refunds to graduates who are unable to find jobs. But for many, these financing options can be a little too good to be true. In the case of Lambda School, even if a student withdraws, they can still be responsible for paying the school if they get a tech job within five years. Recently, Income Share Agreements have also come under regulatory scrutiny for a variety of reasons. According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, some schools misled students to believe ISAs were not actually loans and didn't comply with consumer finance law. Lambda School was also recently censured by the California Department of Financial Protection for claiming that its ISAs were nondischargeable in bankruptcy, when in fact they were. Even Thinkful's tuition refund promise requires strict compliance with certain conditions such as the inability to say no to any "qualifying position." This can place graduates in a very uncomfortable bind. If a graduate receives an offer paying as little as $40,000 they must either accept the job and pay Thinkful's tuition, or reject the job and pay the tuition anyway as they no longer qualify for a refund. In tech hub cities like San Francisco or New York, this is barely within the living wage for single-person households and  far beneath the liveable wage for anybody with dependents, as many bootcamp students are. The best ways to choose a bootcamp
Despite these controversies, bootcamps are serving an ever growing share of students looking to break into tech. And for some, it can be a good career move. Jesse Farmer, co-founder of Dev Bootcamp, one of the first coding bootcamps, sees a need for reform in the industry. Farmer, who now teaches programming at the bootcamp Adjacent, told Insider what prospective students should look for when selecting a school. "Students should be shopping for bootcamps like they shop for houses, but they shop for bootcamps like they're shopping for cereal," he said. Farmer emphasized it's important to take time and make sure a school is a good fit rather than signing up for something immediately. He recommended that prospective students ask schools: "What is the harshest thing ten random graduates from LinkedIn are going to say about your school?" A good school will be honest about the difficulties students in certain situations will face, and may also put prospective students in touch with graduates in similar situations to them. He recommends reaching out to former students independently as well, to be safe. Farmer also stressed the importance of regular code review from experienced programmers in a school's curriculum. "Code reviews are at the intersection of all the important parts of the learning experience. There's the work, the tools, the student, the staff, your peers, and they're all converging into this place called the code review." Farmer encourages students to ask how many code reviews they can expect in a week, and if the answer is less than one, to forgo attending the school. Lambda School offloaded code reviews from its professional instructors to teaching assistants. Eventually, a majority of them were done away with altogether. Farmer warned me that these cost cutting measures are a result of the pressures of trying to scale. "Once you try to scale past the limit of teacher to student, you become more and more just a video library and cool discord channel," he told me. Despite their problems, Speakman told me it is noble to post placement results in public when the norm in education is to sidestep the question of job placement altogether. However, for this transparency to have meaning these results need to be standardized and trustworthy, which isn't possible so long as every large school posts results that are inconsistent in slightly different ways. Unfortunately, large bootcamps are now stuck in a prisoner's dilemma — no school wants to be the first one to post "clean" stats while others continue to fudge their figures. As Speakman told me, "You better learn to self-regulate, because you're not going to like external regulation when it happens." Sign up for notifications from Insider! Stay up to date with what you want to know. Subscribe to push notifications

The biggest coding bootcamps may exaggerate their success rates — here's how to choose one that will actually get you a job

Coding boot camps  have soared in popularity since their inception in  the early 2010s . Course Report, an organization that conducts yearly market studies on boot camps, reports that nearly  25,000 coding boot camp graduates  entered the job market in 2020 — up 39% from the previous year. With the growth in popularity, however, has come an increase in price. Course Report also reports that the average coding boot camp costs more than  $14,000 . As costs increase, new opportunities for students to defer payments have surfaced, such as income share agreements, or ISAs, in which students don’t pay tuition until after they land jobs. Rising Costs Mean Greater Risk
But many payback models come with risks. For example, a recent lawsuit filed against a coding boot camp is based on claims of false advertising around job placement rates that directly impacted students’ ISAs. And throughout history, there have been many predatory educational programs that have sold lies to bring in more revenue. Such instances resulted in  rulings and regulations to protect students. However, it’s still true that tech training programs in the U.S. from for-profit enterprises face a complex balance of wanting to help students access better careers but needing to generate profits and returns for investors. The bottom line is that the tech industry needs to look to new models for teaching coding skills that reduce students’ risk and financial burden. Workforce initiatives and skilling pathways need to be more accessible to all Americans. While traditional college or university career pathways are an excellent option for some, there’s a large and growing pool of people in the U.S. for whom earning a four-year degree is unfeasible . The cost and risk of taking out student loans is a huge barrier, and many students can’t commit the necessary time while they work other jobs or care for families. It’s Time to Create Realistic Opportunities
But the time and money it takes to get a degree or go through a for-profit boot camp is often not an option for many. For similar reasons, the same individuals who can’t take the traditional higher education pathways are still being left on the sidelines by boot camps. It’s time to make opportunities more accessible and realistic for all. Exploring the following strategies can help the tech industry reduce the risk and financial burden of gaining new skills:
1. Create and support accessible, accelerated skilling pathways. Coding boot camps do create a great talent pool. Still, to widen that pool for tech companies and create more accessible opportunities for job seekers, the tech industry needs to support other skilling pathways, such as free and accelerated digital job training courses, that open doors to individuals often shut out of other options. Some options are not only free or affordable, but they also offer opportunities to learn skills part-time. Because this format breaks down barriers presented by traditional education pathways and for-profit boot camps, it’s more accessible to those looking for career changes. It can produce a more diverse talent pool  for tech companies. Plus, getting more career changers into tech means bringing a wide and diverse set of transferrable soft skills into the industry. 2. Formalize apprenticeship programs. Apprenticeship programs are great models for opening the door to more people. They allow entry-level workers to gain the specific skills they need to fill roles at a company while on the job and earning a wage. In this way, it minimizes risks for both employees and companies. As employees learn precisely the skills they need while on the job, they can be sure they’re not risking time, money, and effort to learn potentially irrelevant skills or skills that could become irrelevant in the near future. Companies benefit because they can mold apprentices to whatever skill sets they need. Instead of hoping candidates’ past experiences and education will serve them well in filling open roles, companies ensure candidates can do exactly what they need to fulfill current or future job responsibilities. 3. Upskill existing workers. Even people who are already employed with a company might be interested in educational opportunities to learn new skills or sharpen their existing skill sets. Companies looking to fill tech roles can benefit from looking within their companies first to see whether anyone desires to learn new skills and move into a more technical career path. When companies provide upskilling opportunities to current employees, they retain the talent they already have, provide accessible opportunities for employees to develop their careers, and contribute to a talent pool that will be able to fill future skills gaps . Conclusion
Pursuing a career in technology has long been a hefty financial commitment for students — whether they’re following traditional university pathways or paying for coding boot camps. Meanwhile, the tech industry has struggled for years to fill its skills gap and find adequate workers. Closing the gap will require the tech industry to support more accessible, financially viable opportunities for all. Image Credit: pepi stojanovski; unsplash; thank you! Tags:

Expensive Coding Boot Camps are Limiting the Tech Talent Pool

LivingSocial

Other Investors

Course Report is an online guide for the search and discovery of web development boot camps. The site provides a host of data points and student reviews to help a prospective coder find the best school for their needs and desired outcomes. Course Report is also a leading research consultant on the growing trends across the coding educational landscape.

Name	Liz Eggleston
Work History	LivingSocial
Title	Founder
Status	Current

Wells Fargo Success Story

Professional Services

Platform Overview

Course Report

Executives

Course Report Management Team

1 Team Member